Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Experimental RNAi02:15

Experimental RNAi

RNA interference (RNAi) is a cellular mechanism that inhibits gene expression by suppressing its transcription or activating the RNA degradation process. The mechanism was discovered by Andrew Fire and Craig Mello in 1998 in plants. Today, it is observed in almost all eukaryotes, including protozoa, flies, nematodes, insects, parasites, and mammals. This precise cellular mechanism of gene silencing has been developed into a technique that provides an efficient way to identify and determine the...
siRNA - Small Interfering RNAs02:30

siRNA - Small Interfering RNAs

Small interfering RNAs, or siRNAs, are short regulatory RNA molecules that can silence genes post-transcriptionally, as well as the transcriptional level in some cases. siRNAs are important for protecting cells against viral infections and silencing transposable genetic elements.
In the cytoplasm, siRNA is processed from a double-stranded RNA, which comes from either endogenous DNA transcription or exogenous sources like a virus. This double-stranded RNA is then cleaved by the ATP-dependent...
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay02:27

Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay

The Upf proteins that carry out nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) are found in all eukaryotic organisms, including humans. Each protein has an individual role, but they need to work in collaboration. Upf1 is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that unwinds the RNA helix. Because Upf1 can unwind any RNA, Upf2 and Upf3 are required to help Upf1 discriminate between nonsense and normal mRNAs.
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
MicroRNAs01:22

MicroRNAs

MicroRNA (miRNA) are short, regulatory RNA transcribed from introns—non-coding regions of a gene—or intergenic regions—stretches of DNA present between genes. Several processing steps are required to form biologically active, mature miRNA. The initial transcript, called primary miRNA (pri-mRNA), base-pairs with itself forming a stem-loop structure. Within the nucleus, an endonuclease enzyme, called Drosha, shortens the stem-loop structure into hairpin-shaped pre-miRNA. After the pre-miRNA ends...
MicroRNAs01:22

MicroRNAs

MicroRNA (miRNA) are short, regulatory RNA transcribed from introns (non-coding regions of a gene) or intergenic regions (stretches of DNA present between genes). Several processing steps are required to form biologically active, mature miRNA. The initial transcript, called primary miRNA (pri-mRNA), base-pairs with itself, forming a stem-loop structure. Within the nucleus, an endonuclease enzyme, called Drosha, shortens the stem-loop structure into hairpin-shaped pre-miRNA. After the pre-miRNA...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Evaluation and comparison of antimicrobial property of chitosan nanoparticles on nickel-titanium archwires: an in vivo study.

Dental press journal of orthodontics·2026
Same author

Hyperplasia Functions as a Link between Obesity and Cancer.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Comparison of antimigration versus conventional fully covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a single-center long-term study.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2026
Same author

Development of an endoscopy technician training certificate program in a community college.

iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights·2026
Same author

Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions with tissue sent directly in formalin for histopathologic evaluation compared with cytology: a multicenter prospective pilot study.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells
07:23

Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells

Published on: May 30, 2025

"Selective cell death mediated by small conditional RNAs" is not selective.

Kalpesh Patel1, Scott E Kern

  • 1The Sydney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD USA.

Cancer Biology & Therapy
|June 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers found that small conditional RNAs designed to selectively kill cancer cells did not work as expected. The method, which aimed to trigger an innate immune response, resulted in non-specific cell death and could not be replicated, suggesting the technique is invalid.

Keywords:
PKRRNA hairpincell deathdsRNAhybridization chain reactioninnate immune responsesmall conditional RNAs

More Related Videos

Preparation of Cell-lines for Conditional Knockdown of Gene Expression and Measurement of the Knockdown Effects on E4orf4-Induced Cell Death
13:54

Preparation of Cell-lines for Conditional Knockdown of Gene Expression and Measurement of the Knockdown Effects on E4orf4-Induced Cell Death

Published on: October 21, 2012

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells
07:23

Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells

Published on: May 30, 2025

Preparation of Cell-lines for Conditional Knockdown of Gene Expression and Measurement of the Knockdown Effects on E4orf4-Induced Cell Death
13:54

Preparation of Cell-lines for Conditional Knockdown of Gene Expression and Measurement of the Knockdown Effects on E4orf4-Induced Cell Death

Published on: October 21, 2012

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Immunology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • A prior report described a method using small conditional RNAs to induce selective cell death via the innate immune response (PKR activation).
  • This method was proposed for targeting specific transcripts, including the mesothelin gene in cancer cells and a fusion transcript in a control line.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and specificity of small conditional RNAs for selective cell killing.
  • To replicate and validate the previously reported method targeting mesothelin and a fusion transcript.

Main Methods:

  • Designed small conditional RNAs targeting mesothelin and a tpc/hpr fusion transcript.
  • Tested the functionality of small conditional RNA hairpins in cell-free conditions.
  • Transfected hairpins into six different cell types.

Main Results:

  • Small conditional RNA hairpins were active in cell-free conditions.
  • Transfection resulted in non-specific cell killing for both mesothelin and fusion transcript targets.
  • The previously reported results could not be replicated.

Conclusions:

  • The small conditional RNA-based cell-killing method is likely impaired or invalid due to non-specific effects.
  • The inability to replicate prior findings and observed non-specific cell death undermine the method's utility for targeted cancer therapy.