Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Mortality and long-term virologic outcomes in children and infants treated with lopinavir/ritonavir
Dora Estripeaut1, Jon Mosser, Meg Doherty
1From the *Department of Pediatrics, Hospital del Niño, Panama; †Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; ‡Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and §Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de Salud, Panama.
Insights
Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based therapy significantly improved survival in HIV-infected children, including those over one year old, in a resource-limited setting. Virologic outcomes were not affected by prior antiretroviral exposure or treatment initiation age.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- HIV/AIDS Treatment
- Public Health in Resource-Limited Settings
Background:
- Limited data exists on protease inhibitor-based therapy for young children in resource-limited environments.
- Optimal timing for initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in children surviving infancy requires further investigation.
- The Hospital del Niño in Panama has routinely used lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based therapy for children since 2002.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of HIV-infected children treated with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based therapy.
- To assess the impact of LPV/r therapy on survival and virologic suppression in a real-world, resource-limited setting.
- To determine the optimal timing for initiating LPV/r-based therapy in children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort analysis of HIV-infected children from January 1, 1991, to June 1, 2011.
- Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were employed.
- Evaluation of death, virologic suppression, and virologic rebound as primary outcomes.
Main Results:
- LPV/r-based therapy improved survival in infants and children over one year old.
- Virologic suppression rates were 42.1% at 12 months, 70.5% at 24 months, and 85.1% at 60 months.
- Factors associated with poorer survival included residence outside Panama City; high baseline viral load (>100,000 copies/mL) was linked to lower suppression rates.
Conclusions:
- LPV/r-based therapy is effective in improving survival for HIV-infected children, regardless of age at initiation or prior antiretroviral exposure.
- Achieving virologic suppression with LPV/r therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes.
- Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies in resource-limited settings.
Background:
There is scant data on young children receiving protease inhibitor-based therapy in real-life resource-limited settings and on the optimal timing of therapy among children who survive infancy. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes at the Hospital del Niño, Panama, where children have been routinely treated with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based therapy since 2002.
Methods:
Retrospective cohort analysis of all HIV-infected children enrolled in care between January 1, 1991, and June 1, 2011. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate death, virologic suppression and virologic rebound.
Results:
Of 399 children contributing 1944 person-years of follow-up, 254 (63.7%) were treated with LPV/r and 94 (23.6%) were never treated with antiretrovirals (ARVs). Among infants, improved survival was associated with male gender (hazard rate of death[HRdeath] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.92) and treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HRdeath 0.32, 95% CI: 0.12-0.83), whereas residence outside of Panama City was associated with poorer survival (HRdeath 1.72, 95% CI: 1.01-2.94). Among children who survived to 1 year of age without exposure to ARVs, LPV/r-based therapy improved survival (HRdeath 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.33). Virologic suppression was achieved in 42.1%, 70.5% and 85.1% by 12, 24 and 60 months of follow-up among children treated with LPV/r. Virologic suppression was not associated with prior ARV exposure or age at initiation of therapy but was associated with residence outside of Panama City (HR suppression 1.93, 95% CI: 1.19-3.14). Patients with a baseline viral load >100,000 copies/mL were less likely to achieve suppression (HR suppression 0.37, 95% CI: 0.21-0.66). No children who achieved virologic suppression after initiating LPV/r died.
Conclusions:
LPV/r-based therapy improved survival not only in infants but also in children over 1 year of age. Age at initiation of LPV/r-based therapy or prior ARVs did not impact virologic outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
