Comparison of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation

Okay Abaci1, Cuneyt Kocas, Veysel Oktay

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Institute of Istanbul University, Istanbul 34096, Turkey. drokayabaci@hotmail.com

Insights

Preoperative rosuvastatin and atorvastatin did not significantly differ in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery. Both statins showed similar efficacy in reducing AF incidence in this patient cohort.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) increases stroke risk and healthcare costs after cardiac surgery.
  • Statin therapy is linked to reduced postoperative AF incidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in preventing postoperative AF.
  • To evaluate statin's role in mitigating AF following cardiac procedures.

Main Methods:

  • 168 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were divided into atorvastatin (n=96) and rosuvastatin (n=72) groups.
  • Postoperative ECGs and telemetry monitored for AF during hospitalization.

Main Results:

  • Postoperative AF incidence was 17.9% with atorvastatin and 22.2% with rosuvastatin (P=.48).
  • No significant differences in left ventricular function or patient demographics were observed between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Preoperative rosuvastatin and atorvastatin demonstrated comparable efficacy in preventing postoperative AF.
  • Neither statin showed a superior preventive effect on AF in this study population.
Abstract