Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
Published on: December 23, 2025
Indirect measures as a signal for evaluative change.
Marco Perugini1, Juliette Richetin, Cristina Zogmaister
1a Department of Psychology , University of Milan-Bicocca , Milan , Italy.
Measuring explicit attitudes after implicit ones enhances detection of attitude change. Implicit attitudes changed regardless of measurement order, but only when participants were aware of the contingency. This highlights the impact of measurement order on attitude research.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Implicit and explicit attitudes are malleable through evaluative learning.
- Understanding how measurement order affects attitude change detection is crucial for accurate research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the asymmetric effect of measurement order (indirect vs. direct) on detecting evaluative attitude change.
- To explore whether this effect is consistent across different evaluative learning paradigms.
Main Methods:
- Two studies utilized the self-referencing task with indirect and direct attitude measures.
- A third study employed a supraliminal sequential evaluative conditioning paradigm.
- Evaluative change was assessed in relation to participants' contingency awareness.
Main Results:
- Explicit attitude change was more reliably detected when measured after implicit attitudes.
- Implicit attitude change occurred irrespective of measurement order.
- The order effect was observed in self-referencing tasks but not in evaluative conditioning.
- Evaluative change was only evident in participants aware of the contingency.
Conclusions:
- The order of indirect and direct measures can create an asymmetric effect in detecting explicit attitude change.
- Indirect measures may act as signals influencing self-perception and propositional elaboration.
- Contingency awareness is a key moderator for observed evaluative changes.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
