Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Study protocol: a systematic review of pediatric shared decision making
Kirk D Wyatt1, Gabriela Prutsky Lopez, Juan Pablo Domecq Garces
1Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Insights
This systematic review examines shared decision-making in pediatrics, focusing on interventions and their impact. Due to limited data, a meta-narrative approach will be used to synthesize findings on pediatric shared decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Healthcare Research
- Clinical Decision-Making Science
Background:
- Shared decision-making (SDM) in pediatrics involves children, caregivers, and clinicians.
- Patient involvement in SDM is tailored to developmental levels.
- Limited knowledge exists on pediatric-specific SDM interventions and their effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review pediatric shared decision-making (SDM) practices, tools, techniques, and technologies.
- To summarize the effects of SDM interventions in pediatric care.
- To identify and analyze methods engaging pediatric patients and caregivers in healthcare decisions.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review across multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo).
- Inclusion of original research studies involving patients under 18, caregivers, or both.
- Exclusion of perinatal and research participation decisions; quality assessment performed.
Main Results:
- Anticipated paucity of quantitative data on pediatric SDM interventions.
- Expected heterogeneity in reported results from included studies.
- Potential inability to perform quantitative analysis.
Conclusions:
- A meta-narrative approach is planned due to anticipated data limitations.
- This approach will synthesize findings on pediatric shared decision-making.
- Further research may be needed to address data gaps.
Background:
Shared decision making in pediatrics is unique because it often involves active participation of both the child or adolescent patient and his or her caregiver(s) in the decision making process with the clinician or care team, and the extent to which the patient is involved is commensurate with their developmental level. However, little is known about the nature of pediatric-specific shared decision making interventions and their impact.
Methods/Design:
We will perform a systematic review with the objective of summarizing the nature of shared decision making practices, tools, techniques and technologies in the pediatric setting as well as their effects. A literature search will include Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and Ovid PsycInfo databases in addition to consultation of a group of shared decision making experts to identify unpublished or in-progress works. We will include original research studies involving patients <18 years, their caregivers, or both, and summarize methods and approaches designed to engage participants in the health care decision making process with clinicians. Perinatal and research participation decisions will be excluded. Descriptions of participants involved, interventions used and the measured outcomes will be reported. Quality assessment will be performed according to the design of each study, where possible.
Discussion:
We anticipate that the paucity of published quantitative data and the heterogeneous nature of the reported results will preclude quantitative analysis. In this event, a meta-narrative approach will be undertaken.
Trial Registration:
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42013004761.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

