Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
An experimental study using Rasch analysis to compare absolute magnitude estimation and categorical rating scaling as
Kristin L K Koskey1, Toni A Sondergeld, Svetlana A Beltyukova
1University of Akron, College of Education, Akron, OH 44325-4208, USA. koskey@uakron.edu
Abstract:
Limited research has applied a measurement model to compare the rating scale functioning of categorical rating scaling (CRS) and absolute magnitude estimation scaling (MES) when rating subjective stimuli. We used an experimental design and applied the Rasch model to the survey data, with each respondent rating items using MES and one of four commonly used agreement-disagreement rating scales. The results indicated that the CRS and MES data were comparable in person and item separation and reliability when the respondents' scales were known. MES had lower standard error for people and items; however MES had disordered step calibrations. Finally, the respondents reported preference of CRS to MES.
Related Concept Videos
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated. For...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Nominal Level of Measurement
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal scale is...
Surveys
Ranks

