Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Influence of variable native arterial diameter and vasculature status on coronary diagnostic parameters
Ishan Goswami1, Srikara V Peelukhana, Marwan F Al-Rjoub
1School of Dynamic Systems, Mechanical Engineering Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.
Insights
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) assess coronary artery stenosis severity. The pressure drop coefficient (CDP) shows promise for better stenosis assessment, independent of artery size and condition.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Medical Imaging and Diagnostics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Current methods like fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) assess coronary artery stenosis severity.
- These parameters are invasively measured using guidewires.
- The pressure drop coefficient (CDP) is a novel parameter for stenosis evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of arterial diameter and vascular condition on FFR, CFR, and CDP.
- To evaluate the efficacy of CDP in delineating stenosis severity across different conditions.
- To compare the performance of FFR and CDP under simulated pathophysiological states.
Main Methods:
- In vitro experiments combined with human clinical data.
- Simulation of pathophysiological conditions in two arterial diameters (2.5mm and 3mm).
- Evaluation of diagnostic parameters (FFR, CDP) for mild, intermediate, and severe stenosis with and without myocardial infarction (MI).
Main Results:
- Arterial diameter minimally affected FFR in mild to intermediate stenosis.
- Myocardial infarction (MI) led to underestimation of stenosis severity by FFR due to reduced pressure drops.
- CDP demonstrated variability with diameter and vascular condition but offered non-overlapping ranges for better stenosis delineation.
Conclusions:
- FFR may underestimate stenosis severity in conditions like MI, potentially impacting clinical decisions.
- CDP provides a more robust measure of stenosis severity, independent of arterial diameter and vascular conditions.
- CDP warrants further investigation as a superior diagnostic parameter for coronary artery stenosis.
Abstract:
In current practice, diagnostic parameters, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR), are used to determine the severity of a coronary artery stenosis. FFR is defined as the ratio of hyperemic pressures distal (p(rh)) and proximal (p(ah)) to a stenosis. CFR is the ratio of flow at hyperemic and basal condition. Another diagnostic parameter suggested by our group is the pressure drop coefficient (CDP). CDP is defined as the ratio of the pressure drop across the stenosis to the upstream dynamic pressure. These parameters are evaluated by invasively measuring flow (CFR), pressure (FFR), or both (CDP) in a diseased artery using guidewire tipped with a sensor. Pathologic state of artery is indicated by lower CFR (<2). Similarly, FFR lower than 0.75 leads to clinical intervention. Cutoff for CDP is under investigation. Diameter and vascular condition influence both flow and pressure drop, and thus, their effect on FFR and CDP was studied. In vitro experiment coupled with pressure-flow relationships from human clinical data was used to simulate pathophysiologic conditions in two representative arterial diameters, 2.5 mm (N1) and 3 mm (N2). With a 0.014 in. (0.35 mm) guidewire inserted, diagnostic parameters were evaluated for mild (∼64% area stenosis (AS)), intermediate (∼80% AS), and severe (∼90% AS) stenosis for both N1 and N2 arteries, and between two conditions, with and without myocardial infarction (MI). Arterial diameter did not influence FFR for clinically relevant cases of mild and intermediate stenosis (difference < 5%). Stenosis severity was underestimated due to higher FFR (mild: ∼9%, intermediate: ∼ 20%, severe: ∼ 30%) for MI condition because of lower pressure drops, and this may affect clinical decision making. CDP varied with diameter (mild: ∼20%, intermediate: ∼24%, severe: by 2.5 times), and vascular condition (mild: ∼35%, intermediate: ∼14%, severe: ∼ 9%). However, nonoverlapping range of CDP allowed better delineation of stenosis severities irrespective of diameter and vascular condition.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

