Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining EEG signals from the 2 members of a team to improve event identification.

Neuroimage. Reports·2026
Same author

Using the environment to predict memory performance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Reducing Mass Spectrometry Noise via Coupled Desorption Flux and Background Modeling.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry·2025
Same author

Using a computational cognitive model to simulate the effects of personal and social network experiences on seasonal influenza vaccination decisions.

Frontiers in epidemiology·2024
Same author

Tracking the Cognitive Band in an Open-Ended Task.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

UV damage induces production of mitochondrial DNA fragments with specific length profiles.

Genetics·2024
Same journal

Artificial intelligence as a partner in meta-analysis-Research agenda, user recommendations, and speed-accuracy tradeoffs: Commentary on Jansen et al. (2025).

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Relationships between cognition and daily functioning in adults with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The association between reading anxiety and reading achievement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High math anxiety is associated with lower math achievement across 90 countries: An individual participant data meta-analysis of representative student and adult samples.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Is thinking inherently unpleasant? A cautionary note on David, Vassena, and Bijleveld (2024).

Psychological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

Navigating complex decision spaces: Problems and paradigms in sequential choice.

Matthew M Walsh1, John R Anderson2

  • 1Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

Psychological Bulletin
|July 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Learning from delayed consequences, known as temporal credit assignment, is crucial for adaptive behavior. This review explores reinforcement learning models and their neural underpinnings in humans and animals.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Adaptive behavior requires learning from action consequences, which is challenging with delayed feedback.
  • The temporal credit assignment problem addresses how to attribute outcomes to intermediate actions in a sequence.
  • Reinforcement learning offers model-free and model-based approaches to solve this problem.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review connections between learning theories, control mechanisms, and reinforcement learning models.
  • To examine temporal credit assignment problems through the lens of reinforcement learning.
  • To identify neural substrates associated with model-free and model-based reinforcement learning.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review connecting stimulus-response and cognitive learning theories.
  • Examination of habitual versus goal-directed control.
  • Analysis of model-free and model-based reinforcement learning strategies.
  • Review of problems including second-order conditioning, latent learning, and hierarchical learning.
  • Investigation of neural substrates for reinforcement learning.

Main Results:

  • Model-free reinforcement learning is linked to dopamine and basal ganglia.
  • Model-based reinforcement learning involves prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobes, cerebellum, and basal ganglia.
  • Reinforcement learning provides a framework for understanding animal and human behavior.
  • Reinforcement learning models offer insights into neural reward valuation and action selection.

Conclusions:

  • Reinforcement learning provides a robust framework for understanding temporal credit assignment in behavior and neural mechanisms.
  • Distinct neural circuits support model-free and model-based reinforcement learning.
  • These models offer valuable insights into reward processing and decision-making across species.