Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Golgi casein kinase-mediated phosphorylation of osteopontin orchestrates macrophage- lung-resident mesenchymal stem cells crosstalk and fibrogenesis: a targetable macromolecular axis.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Ultrafast Hopping Transfer Enables High-Anion Conduction.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

AL109933.1 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression via downregulating the Warburg effect and inactivating the YY1/PKM2/PIK3R1/PI3K/AKT/ mTOR/HIF-1α axis.

Cellular signalling·2026
Same author

Designing High-Performance Dual-Ion Batteries at High-Voltage: Challenges, Strategies, and Prospects.

Nano-micro letters·2026
Same author

Fast and reliable association discovery in large-scale microbiome studies and meta-analyses using PALM.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

PKA and PKC signaling pathways mediate vitamin D₃-regulated intestinal phosphorus absorption in broiler chickens.

Poultry science·2026
Same journal

Chemotactic self-organization captures the dynamics of mammalian hair follicle patterning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Tomographic imaging of superconducting order using particle-hole interference.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inferring epidemiological parameters under an infectious phylogeography model with visitor dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Analytical modeling for suction cup designs for skin-interfaced wearable devices.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Improving cell-free metabolism through direct integration of artificial respiratory chains.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Biclustering with heterogeneous variance.

Guanhua Chen1, Patrick F Sullivan, Michael R Kosorok

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|July 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical method for cancer research to identify patient subgroups by analyzing gene expression data. The approach accounts for variations in gene expression, improving cancer subtype discovery and diagnosis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Biostatistics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Accurate cancer patient classification is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment.
  • Existing clustering methods often overlook the heterogeneity of variance in gene expression data, potentially leading to inaccurate subgroup identification.
  • Hypervariability in gene expression is a recognized characteristic of many cancer subtypes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a statistical approach that models both the mean and variance structures in genetic data for improved cancer subtyping.
  • To address the limitations of existing methods that ignore variance heterogeneity in gene expression profiles.
  • To enhance the accuracy of identifying biologically relevant cancer subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • A novel statistical method designed to capture both mean and variance structures in genetic datasets.
  • Application of the method to synthetic datasets for validation.
  • Testing the method on two real-world cancer datasets, including lung cancer data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed statistical approach effectively models mean and variance in genetic data.
  • The method confirmed the hypervariability of methylation levels in cancer patients.
  • Clearer and more accurate cancer subgroup patterns were detected, particularly in lung cancer data.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical method offers a more robust approach to cancer subtyping by considering variance heterogeneity.
  • This method has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic strategies in oncology.
  • The findings highlight the importance of accounting for variance structure in genetic data analysis for cancer research.