Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Supporting non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments (CORA)
Peter M Wiedemann1, Franziska Boerner, Gregor Dürrenberger
1Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Science Forum EMF, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
Purpose:
One of the crucial communication issues that have to be tackled by risk assessors is how to provide a comprehensible and informative characterization of their findings. The CORA framework (CORA stands for credibility of risk assessment) is designed for helping non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments. The CORA framework can be used by (1) stakeholders and policy makers, to make an educated judgment about the credibility of an assessment, and (2) the authors of a risk assessment, to improve the evaluability of their reports. The CORA framework consists of 18 criteria, leading to six main recommendations. The framework's application is not limited to (EMF) risk assessment, for which it was originally developed, but can be used in any area of risk or hazard assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Confidence Coefficient
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Reliability and Validity
