Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the
Koichiro Ueki1, Katsuhiko Okabe2, Kohei Marukawa2
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Head: Prof. Dr. K. Ueki), Division of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo-shi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to compare the temporal changes in condylar long axis and skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with the hybrid fixation technique and the conventional plate fixation.
Patients And Methods:
Of 44 Japanese patients diagnosed with mandibular prognathism, 22 underwent SSRO with the conventional plate fixation (1 u-HA/PLLA plate and 4 monocortical screws in each side) and 22 underwent SSRO with a hybrid fixation technique (1 u-HA/PLLA plate and 4 monocortical screws and bicortical screw in each side). The temporal changes in condylar long axis and skeletal stability were assessed by axial, frontal, and lateral cephalograms. After surgery, breakage of the plate and screws was checked by 3-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT).
Results:
Although there was a significant difference between the groups regarding Me-Ag in T1 (P = 0.0138), there were no significant differences between the groups for the other measurements in lateral, frontal and axial cephalometric analysis in each time interval. In two cases, 4 sides in the conventional plate fixation group, failure of the absorbable plate was found by 3DCT. However, there was no breakage in the hybrid fixation group.
Conclusion:
This study suggested that there were no significant differences in the postoperative temporal changes between the two groups in mandibular setback surgery.
