Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Induction of Invasive Transitional Cell Bladder Carcinoma in Immune Intact Human MUC1 Transgenic Mice: A Model for Immunotherapy Development
Published on: October 30, 2013
Optimizing systemic therapy for bladder cancer
Sumanta K Pal1, Matthew I Milowsky, Elizabeth R Plimack
1Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California 91010, USA. spal@coh.org
Abstract:
Over the past several decades, few new systemic agents have been incorporated into the treatment paradigm for bladder cancer. Platinum-based therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment in the perioperative and metastatic settings. Despite level one evidence, use of cisplatin-based therapy in the neoadjuvant setting has been dismal. Second-line therapy for metastatic disease has only modest activity with no survival benefit. However, the elucidation and investigation of novel molecular targets, new therapeutics, and associated biomarkers with strong biologic rationale are actively changing the landscape in bladder cancer. Although the field is moving rapidly, no new drug approvals are currently pending and a need remains to continue to educate the medical oncology and urology communities on the optimal use of currently available treatments. This article outlines the evidence, including that from prospective studies and meta-analyses, providing the basis for the current recommendations from NCCN, and details previous and ongoing studies of targeted therapy for bladder cancer.
Insights
Systemic agents for bladder cancer treatment are limited, with platinum-based therapy being standard. Research into novel molecular targets and therapies is ongoing, but education on current treatments remains crucial.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Urology
Background:
- Limited new systemic agents for bladder cancer treatment over decades.
- Platinum-based therapy is the standard but underutilized in the neoadjuvant setting.
- Second-line metastatic treatment shows modest activity without survival benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence supporting current bladder cancer treatment recommendations.
- To detail ongoing targeted therapy studies for bladder cancer.
- To highlight the need for continued education on optimal treatment use.
Main Methods:
- Review of evidence from prospective studies and meta-analyses.
- Analysis of NCCN guidelines basis.
- Summary of past and current targeted therapy investigations.
Main Results:
- Cisplatin-based therapy use in the neoadjuvant setting is low despite evidence.
- Limited efficacy and no survival benefit observed in second-line metastatic treatment.
- Active investigation into novel molecular targets and therapeutics is changing the treatment landscape.
Conclusions:
- Despite rapid advancements, no new drugs are currently pending approval.
- Optimal use of existing treatments requires ongoing education for medical oncology and urology professionals.
- Targeted therapies and biomarker research hold promise for future bladder cancer treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
