Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Application of Integration: Problem Solving01:30

Application of Integration: Problem Solving

The process of breathing involves the periodic intake and expulsion of air, known as the respiratory cycle, which typically lasts about five seconds. Modeling the volume of air inhaled into the lungs as a function of time provides insight into both the dynamics and efficiency of pulmonary ventilation. This volume is determined by integrating the airflow rate over time, which captures the cumulative effect of air entering the lungs.Sinusoidal Model of AirflowAirflow during respiration is not...
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complete Genome Sequences of Eleven Cluster DJ <i>Gordonia rubripertincta</i> Bacteriophages.

microPublication biology·2026
Same author

Planning clinically relevant biomarker validation studies using the "number needed to treat" concept.

Journal of translational medicine·2016
Same author

Want a letter? You write it for me.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2016
Same author

Improving Cancer Gene Expression Data Quality through a TCGA Data-Driven Evaluation of Identifier Filtering.

Cancer informatics·2015
Same author

Computer Simulation, Bioinformatics, and Statistical Analysis of Cancer Data and Processes.

Cancer informatics·2015
Same author

What Tumor Dynamics Modeling Can Teach us About Exploiting the Stem-Cell View for Better Cancer Treatment.

Cancer informatics·2015
Same journal

Covariance decomposition for distance based species tree estimation.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SNPio: a Python interface for population genomic data processing.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SpaHNR: a spatial domain identification method via sparse attention-based hierarchical node representation and multi-view contrastive learning.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

A decision theory paradigm for evaluating identifier mapping and filtering methods using data integration.

Roger S Day1, Kevin K McDade

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. day01@pitt.edu

BMC Bioinformatics
|July 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new data-driven paradigm to evaluate bioinformatics tools for molecular identification (MI) filtering and mapping. This method rigorously compares methods, improving data integration and quality control in biological research.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics
  • Proteomics

Background:

  • Bioinformatics data pre-processing requires accurate molecular identification (MI) for biological interpretation.
  • Molecular identification can be erroneous, necessitating identifier filtering (IDF) and identifier mapping (IDM) for combining high-throughput data.
  • Numerous IDF and IDM methods exist, lacking standardized evaluation protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a rigorous, data-grounded paradigm for evaluating and comparing bioinformatics methods for molecular identification (MI), identifier filtering (IDF), and identifier mapping (IDM).
  • To provide a framework for assessing the quality of data pre-processing steps in biological research.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an evaluation paradigm utilizing a large set of biological samples measured across multiple high-throughput platforms.
  • Employed a model family to connect features from different platforms and an association measure.
  • Fitted mixture models coupled with a decision framework to assess method performance.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the paradigm's utility in comparing IDM resources for transcript-protein associations.
  • Evaluated and compared various microarray probeset IDF methods and their combinations.
  • Selected optimal quality thresholds for tandem mass spectrometry spectral events.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed paradigm offers a data-driven approach to assess the quality of IDM, IDF, and other bioinformatics pre-processing steps.
  • Facilitates optimal semantic data integration and filtering for researchers.
  • Aids bioinformatics database curators in quality tracking and troubleshooting MI errors.