Sensitivity of locally naturalized Panicum species to HPPD- and ALS-inhibiting herbicides in maize
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Protocols for Robust Herbicide Resistance Testing in Different Weed Species
Published on: July 2, 2015
B De Cauwer1, T Geeroms, S Claerhout
1Ghent University, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Plant Production, Coupure Links 653, BE-9000 Gent, Belgium. Benny.Decauwer@UGent.be
Abstract:
Until recently the Panicum species Panicum schinzii Hack. (Transvaal millet), Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. (Fall panicum) and Panicum capillare L. (Witchgrass) were completely overlooked in Belgium. Since 1970, these species have gradually spread and are now locally naturalized and abundant in and along maize fields. One of the possible raisons for their expansion in maize fields might be a lower sensitivity to postemergence herbicides acting against panicoid grasses, in particular those inhibiting 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) and acetolactate synthase (ALS). A dose-response pot experiment was conducted in the greenhouse to evaluate the effectiveness of five HPPD-inhibiting herbicides (sulcotrione, mesotrione, isoxaflutole, topramezone, tembotrione) and two ALS-inhibiting herbicides (nicosulfuron, foramsulfuron) for controlling Belgian populations of P. schinzii, P. dichotomiflorum and P. capillare. Shortly after sowing, half of all pots were covered with a film of activated charcoal to evaluate foliar activity of the applied herbicides. In another dose-response pot experiment, sensitivity of five local P. dichotomiflorum populations to HPPD-inhibitors and nicosulfuron was investigated. Finally, the influence of leaf stage at time of herbicide application on efficacy of topramezone and nicosulfuron for Panicum control was evaluated. Large interspecific differences in sensitivity to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides were observed. Panicum schinzii was sensitive (i.e., required a dose lower than the maximum authorized field dose to achieve 90% reduction in biomass) to tembotrione but moderately sensitive (i.e. required maximum field dose) to topramezone and poorly sensitive (i.e. required three-fold higher dose than maximum field dose) to mesotrione and sulcotrione. However, P. dichotomiflorum, a species that morphologically closely resembles P. schinzii, was sensitive to mesotrione and topramezone but moderately sensitive to tembotrione. All Panicum species were sensitive to low doses of nicosulfuron and foramsulfuron. The relative contribution from soil activity to weed control resulting from postemergence applications was important for isoxaflutole, sulcotrione, tembotrione and mesotrione but not for topramezone, nicosulfuron and foramsulfuron. Naturalized Panicum dichotomiflorum populations exhibited differential herbicide sensitivity profiles. Panicum schinzii, P. capillare and P.dichotomiflorum showed a progressive decrease in sensitivity to topramezone and nicosulfuron during seedling development. A satisfactory postemergence control of Panicum species in the field will require appropriate choice of herbicide and dose, as well as a more timely application (i.e. before weeds reach the four leaves stage).

