Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Association Between Sleep Quality and Cognitive Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder
Published on: April 26, 2024
Testing the McSad depression specific classification system in patients with somatic conditions: validity and
Katerina Papageorgiou1, Karin M Vermeulen, Maya J Schroevers
1Health Psychology Section, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.papageorgiou@umcg.nl
The McSad depression scale demonstrates strong construct validity in patients with chronic somatic conditions, outperforming the EQ-5D system in capturing depression severity. This makes McSad a recommended tool for evaluating depression in these populations.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry and Psychology
- Medical Informatics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Depression valuation is crucial for assessing interventions in chronic somatic conditions.
- The McSad is a depression classification system designed for valuation but lacks use in somatic patients.
- The EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5DTM) is a commonly used classification system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the construct validity of the McSad in diabetes and cancer patients.
- To compare the McSad's performance against the EQ-5DTM in reflecting depression states.
- To evaluate the suitability of McSad for depression valuation in somatic conditions.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional data collected online and on paper from 114 diabetes and 436 cancer patients.
- Correlational analyses assessed McSad domains against depression (CES-D, PHQ-9), self-esteem (RSE), and extraversion (EPQ-e).
- Multiple linear regression compared variance in depression scores explained by McSad versus EQ-5DTM.
Main Results:
- McSad domains showed moderate to high correlations with depression measures (CES-D: .41–.70; PHQ-9: .52–.76).
- McSad exhibited low to moderate correlations with RSE (-.21–.-.48) and EPQ-e (.18–.31).
- McSad explained a significantly greater proportion of variance in depression scores (Diabetes: 73–82%; Cancer: 72%) compared to EQ-5DTM (Diabetes: 47–59%; Cancer: 47–51%).
Conclusions:
- The study supports the construct validity of the McSad in patients with somatic conditions.
- McSad demonstrates superior performance over EQ-5DTM in capturing the spectrum of depression in somatic patients.
- McSad is recommended for future depression valuation in individuals with chronic medical conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe and...
