Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
Assessment of the Mouth01:26

Assessment of the Mouth

A thorough mouth assessment, including inspection and palpation of the lips, gums, tongue, tonsils, uvula, and pharynx, is crucial in detecting potential health issues. Diseases ranging from oral cancer to systemic conditions like diabetes could be identified early through careful oral examination. This article provides a detailed guide on conducting a comprehensive mouth assessment.
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Missed opportunities for Hepatitis C Virus screening and care among persons hospitalized for injection-related infections.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same author

Failure to Treat Opioid Use Disorder and Opioid Withdrawal Associated with Patient-Directed Discharge in People with Injection-Related Infections.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

The chief resident selection process: A national survey of internal medicine residency program directors.

The American journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Reducing Hospital Readmissions for Injection Drug Use-Related Infections: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Health Care Teams' Consultations to Inform Intervention Design.

Journal of addiction medicine·2026
Same author

Continuum of care in hospitalized patients with opioid or stimulant use disorder and infectious complications of drug use-substance use/infectious disease integrated clinic compared to treatment as usual to prevent infection-related readmission (CHOICE-STAR): a study protocol for an effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
Same author

Homeless Services Data vs Health Records to Recognize Homelessness.

JAMA health forum·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Evaluating oral case presentations using a checklist: how do senior student-evaluators compare with faculty?

Seema P Kakar1, Jillian S Catalanotti, Andrea L Flory

  • 1Department of Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20037, USA. skakar@mfa.gwu.edu

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|July 27, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Senior medical students reliably assessed oral case presentations (OCPs), showing strong agreement with faculty. This supports peer assessment in low-stakes settings, but leniency warrants caution in high-stakes evaluations.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Clinical Skills Assessment
  • Healthcare Professional Training

Background:

  • Student-evaluators have demonstrated reliability in assessing certain clinical skills.
  • The efficacy of student-evaluators for oral case presentations (OCPs) remains understudied.
  • Validating peer assessment models is crucial for effective medical training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of using senior medical students as evaluators for oral case presentations (OCPs).
  • To compare the assessment performance of student-evaluators against faculty physicians.
  • To determine the reliability and agreement levels between student and faculty assessments of OCPs.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a dichotomous checklist for real-time assessment of OCPs.
  • Trained 30 fourth-year medical students (student-evaluators) to assess 170 second-year students' OCPs.
  • Compared student-evaluator assessments with faculty scores from video-recorded OCPs, analyzing individual items, total scores, and pass/fail decisions.

Main Results:

  • High correlation (0.84) was found between student-evaluator and faculty total scores, exceeding faculty-faculty correlation (0.71).
  • Agreement between faculty and student-evaluators on pass/fail decisions was 74% (Kappa = 0.46).
  • Student-evaluator scores were significantly more lenient than faculty scores (72% vs. 56% pass rates).

Conclusions:

  • Senior medical students can reliably assess OCP skills, supporting their use in peer assessment.
  • Student-evaluators are suitable for low-stakes OCP evaluations, offering a practical, low-resource solution.
  • Caution is advised when using student-evaluators in high-stakes settings due to observed leniency compared to faculty assessment.