Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Treatment Failure Among Infected Periprosthetic Patients at a Highly Specialized Revision TKA Referral Practice
Ran Schwarzkopf1, Daniel Oh, Elizabeth Wright
1Orthopaedic Department, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Abstract:
Deep infection is a serious and costly complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can increase patient morbidity and compromise functional outcome and satisfaction. Two-stage revision with an interval of parental antibiotics has been shown to be the most successful treatment in eradicating deep infection following TKA. We report a large series by a single surgeon with a highly specialized revision TKA referral practice. We identified 84 patients treated by a two-stage revision. We defined "successful two-stage revision" as negative intraoperative cultures and no further infection-related procedure. We defined "eradication of infection" on the basis of negative cultures and clinical diagnosis. After a mean follow up of 25 months, eradication of the infection was documented in 90.5% of the patients; some had undergone further surgical intervention after the index two-stage procedure. Successful two-stage revision (e.g. no I&D, fusion, amputation) was documented only in 63.5% of the patients. We also observed a trend between presence of resistant staphylococcus (MRSA) (p=0.05) as well as pre-revision surgical procedures (p=0.08) and a lower likelihood of successfully two-stage revision. Factors affecting the high failure rate included multiple surgeries prior to the two-stage revision done at our institution, and high prevalence of MRSA present among failed cases. The relatively high rate of failure to achieve a successful two-stage revision observed in our series may be attributed to the highly specialized referral practice. Thus increasing the prevalence of patients with previous failed attempts at infection eradication and delayed care as well as more fragile and immune compromised hosts.
Insights
Two-stage revision surgery is effective for eradicating deep knee replacement infections, achieving a 90.5% eradication rate. However, successful revision without further procedures was only 63.5%, influenced by MRSA and prior surgeries.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Disease Management
Background:
- Deep infection is a significant complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
- Two-stage revision surgery with an antibiotic interval is a primary treatment for TKA deep infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the success and eradication rates of two-stage revision surgery for deep TKA infections in a specialized referral practice.
- To identify factors influencing the success of two-stage revision TKA.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 84 patients undergoing two-stage revision TKA by a single surgeon.
- Defined successful two-stage revision and infection eradication based on intraoperative cultures and clinical diagnosis.
- Analyzed outcomes including infection eradication, need for further procedures, and correlation with factors like MRSA and prior surgeries.
Main Results:
- Infection eradication was achieved in 90.5% of patients after a mean follow-up of 25 months.
- Successful two-stage revision (no further procedures) was achieved in only 63.5% of patients.
- A trend towards lower success rates was associated with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multiple pre-revision surgeries.
Conclusions:
- While two-stage revision effectively eradicates deep TKA infections, achieving a successful revision without further intervention is challenging.
- High rates of MRSA and prior surgical interventions in a specialized referral practice contribute to lower success rates.
- Patient selection and management of complex cases with prior treatment failures are critical for optimizing outcomes.