Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Constraint on Atmospheric Millicharged Particles with the LUX-ZEPLIN Experiment.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

New Constraints on Cosmic Ray-Boosted Dark Matter from the LUX-ZEPLIN Experiment.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2  Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Constraints on Covariant Dark-Matter-Nucleon Effective Field Theory Interactions from the First Science Run of the LUX-ZEPLIN Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Phosphocalcic metabolism and its potential association with biomarkers of kidney disease in dogs with spontaneous hyperadrenocorticism.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2024
Same author

Description of serum symmetric dimethylarginine concentration and of urinary SDS-AGE pattern in dogs with ACTH dependent hyperadrenocorticism.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Confidence intervals of reference limits in small reference sample groups.

J P Braun1, D Concordet, A Geffré

  • 1Université de Toulouse, UPS, INP, ENVT, UMS006, Sciences Cliniques, Toulouse, France.

Veterinary Clinical Pathology
|August 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Small reference sample groups in veterinary clinical pathology can lead to imprecise reference limits. Reporting confidence intervals for these limits is crucial, especially when sample sizes are very small (n < 20).

Keywords:
Group partitioninghealthy animalsreference intervals

More Related Videos

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Clinical Pathology
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Reference intervals are essential for interpreting laboratory test results.
  • Veterinary clinical pathology often faces challenges with small reference populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate how limited sample sizes impact the precision of reference limits.
  • To understand the implications of small reference groups in veterinary diagnostics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Gaussian and log-Gaussian distributions with sample sizes (n) from 10 to 750.
  • Calculation of reference limits and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CI).
  • Estimation of limit imprecision using the ratio of 90% CI width to reference interval width (WCI/WRI).

Main Results:

  • For Gaussian data, WCI/WRI typically exceeds 0.2 when n < 55.
  • Log-Gaussian distributions show increased upper limit imprecision with high skewness and decreased lower limit imprecision.
  • The WCI/WRI ratio indicates significant imprecision with smaller sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • Confidence intervals for reference limits must always be reported, regardless of sample size.
  • Very small sample groups (n < 20) may yield misleading calculations; reporting all individual values is recommended.
  • Understanding the imprecision of reference limits is vital for accurate diagnostic interpretation in veterinary medicine.