Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview01:03

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic01:21

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors...
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy01:22

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it produces...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The scene phase of disaster victim identification (DVI): Lessons learned from deployments, training, and police and defence force collaborative exercises.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same author

A model-based assessment of anthropogenic disturbance on lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages.

Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)·2026
Same author

Nicotinamide salvage is required for proliferation and sustaining self-renewal in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells.

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2025
Same author

The US EPA's National Nutrient Inventory: Critical Shifts in US Nutrient Pollution Sources from 1987 to 2017.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Cell villages and Dirichlet modeling map human cell fitness genetics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

A systems toxicology approach implicates post-transcriptional regulatory networks in reproductive defects from PFAS exposure.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

Using sparse dose-response data for wildlife risk assessment.

Ryan A Hill1, Brian J Pyper, Gary S Lawrence

  • 1Azimuth Consulting Group Partnership, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
|August 6, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Wildlife risk assessments should move beyond simple hazard quotients. Utilizing comprehensive dose-response data and advanced modeling provides a more accurate understanding of ecological risks and uncertainty.

Keywords:
Dose-responseEcological riskExposure-responseToxicity reference valuesWildlife

More Related Videos

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies
09:37

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

Published on: January 19, 2022

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System
06:25

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System

Published on: January 12, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies
09:37

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

Published on: January 19, 2022

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System
06:25

Evaluating Toxicity of Chemicals using a Zebrafish Vibration Startle Response Screening System

Published on: January 12, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Ecological Risk Assessment
  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Wildlife Biology

Background:

  • Hazard quotients (HQs) using point-estimate comparisons of exposure to toxicity reference values (TRVs) are standard for wildlife risk characterization.
  • However, HQs offer limited insight into effect magnitudes and uncertainty, making them insufficient for detailed assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for enhanced wildlife risk assessment methodologies.
  • To promote the comprehensive utilization of dose-response data for improved decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Compile and extract data from relevant ecotoxicological studies.
  • Visually explore dose-response data, focusing on relevant exposure ranges and variations across studies and species.
  • Consider quantitative dose-response modeling, including simple and advanced approaches, to better interpret data.

Main Results:

  • Point-estimate HQs are inadequate for detailed wildlife risk assessments.
  • Thorough data compilation, extraction, and exploration are crucial steps.
  • Quantitative dose-response models can improve risk characterization, though data sparsity presents challenges for advanced models.

Conclusions:

  • Shift from simple hazard quotients to comprehensive dose-response data analysis for wildlife risk assessment.
  • Employ data visualization and quantitative modeling to better understand ecological risks and associated uncertainties.
  • Further development and application of advanced modeling techniques are needed, especially when dealing with sparse data.