Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

First Impression01:09

First Impression

First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals01:30

Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals

The actions and characteristics of others heavily influence the causes of social behaviors. Emotional expressions serve as powerful social signals, shaping behaviors and interactions in significant ways. Whether through direct observation or subconscious processing, individuals constantly adjust their responses based on the emotions and attributes of those around them.Emotional Cues and Social ResponsesFacial expressions, tone of voice, and body language provide crucial emotional cues that...
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining the link between social emotion regulation and relationship satisfaction at dyad and individual levels of analysis.

Research square·2026
Same author

Neural representations of popularity and leadership status relate to conformity in daily life.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The random dyadic interdependence model: Modeling variability in physiological covariation within dyads.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Staying connected: How close friendships supported emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Neural commonalities and dissociations of human social and experiential learning.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Predicting individual differences in digital alcohol intervention effectiveness through multimodal data.

NPJ digital medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

Learning biases underlying individual differences in sensitivity to social rejection.

Andreas Olsson1, Susanna Carmona, Geraldine Downey

  • 1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Andreas.Olsson@ki.se

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
|August 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Rejection sensitivity (RS) influences how people learn about social threats. Individuals high in RS show a persistent fear response to angry faces, suggesting RS biases threat expectation learning.

More Related Videos

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
05:03

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
05:03

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Individual differences in rejection sensitivity (RS) affect social functioning and health.
  • Understanding how RS influences the perception and learning of social threat is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of rejection sensitivity (RS) on learning about social threat.
  • To explore the mechanisms by which RS may act as a self-fulfilling prophecy in social interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a classical fear conditioning paradigm.
  • Utilized angry, neutral, and nonsocial stimuli to assess conditioned responses.
  • Compared fear extinction between individuals with high and low rejection sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • Individuals with high rejection sensitivity (RS) exhibited resistance to extinction of conditioned responses to angry faces.
  • No significant differences in conditioned responses were observed for neutral faces or nonsocial stimuli.
  • Findings suggest RS biases the updating of learned threat expectations.

Conclusions:

  • Rejection sensitivity (RS) impairs the ability to flexibly update expectations regarding social threat.
  • This bias in threat learning may contribute to the self-fulfilling prophecy nature of rejection sensitivity.
  • RS influences cognitive processes related to threat detection and fear regulation.