Related Experiment Videos
Coming to terms with facial reproduction
1Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|July 1, 1990
Summary
Forensic facial reconstruction, used to identify unknown remains, suffers from ambiguous terminology. "Facial reproduction" is proposed as a precise, new term to improve clarity in forensic science.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Anthropology
- Forensic Art
Background:
- The identification of unknown human remains frequently involves creating facial approximations.
- Current terminology for this process is inconsistent and often overlaps with other forensic contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the ambiguity in terminology used for creating facial approximations from skulls.
- To propose a precise and unique term for this forensic procedure.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing terminology used in forensic facial approximation.
- Analysis of the specific meanings and applications of terms like reconstitution, reconstruction, restoration, death mask, moulage, and sculpture within forensic science.
Main Results:
- Multiple terms, including reconstitution, reconstruction, restoration, death mask, moulage, and sculpture, are already established in forensic science with different meanings.
- These existing terms create confusion when applied to the process of building faces on skulls for identification.
Conclusions:
- The term "facial reproduction" is suggested as a novel and precise alternative.
- "Facial reproduction" is recommended to enhance clarity and avoid confusion in forensic identification procedures.