Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methodological Approaches to Real-World Evidence Generation for Glucagon-like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Statins and risk of cardiovascular disease: Emulating a primary prevention trial in breast cancer survivors.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Long-term effects of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a multicountry, population-based randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Extending inferences from a randomized trial to trial-eligible and treatment-candidate target populations: examples of generalizability and transportability.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The TARGET guideline for reporting observational studies of interventions.

Nature medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

Matched designs and causal diagrams.

Mohammad A Mansournia1, Miguel A Hernán, Sander Greenland

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mansournia_ma@yahoo.com

International Journal of Epidemiology
|August 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Causal diagrams clarify how matching in cohort and case-control studies affects variable independence and confounding. Proper handling of matched variables is crucial to avoid bias, especially when matching on intermediate variables.

Keywords:
Matchingbiascausal diagramunfaithfulness

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Matching is a common technique in observational studies to control confounding.
  • The implications of matching on causal relationships and potential biases are not always fully understood.
  • Causal diagrams offer a graphical approach to represent causal relationships and study designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate the consequences of matching using causal diagrams.
  • To provide guidance on the appropriate handling of matched variables in cohort and case-control studies.
  • To visualize and explain previous findings on matched studies through a causal inference framework.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing causal diagrams to represent study designs and variable relationships.
  • Analyzing the impact of the matching process on variable independence (unfaithfulness).
  • Examining the role of matched variables in confounding and bias in different study designs.

Main Results:

  • Matching can induce unfaithfulness, making variables independent that are causally linked.
  • Cohort matching can control for confounding by matched variables, but adjustments may require their control.
  • Case-control matching often fails to prevent confounding by matched variables, necessitating their control.

Conclusions:

  • Causal diagrams effectively visualize the effects of matching on confounding and bias.
  • Careful consideration of matched variables is essential in both cohort and case-control studies.
  • Matching on variables affected by exposure/outcome or on intermediates introduces bias that cannot be corrected.