Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026
Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Long-term effects of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a multicountry,
Michal F Kaminski1, Mette Kalager2, Magnus Løberg2
1Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Background:
We previously reported the 10-year effects of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Here, we report the effects after 13 years of follow-up.
Methods:
In this multicountry, population-based randomised controlled trial, 84 583 men and women aged 55-64 years at enrolment from Norway, Poland, and Sweden were randomly allocated (1:2) to colonoscopy screening or no screening and analysed. The primary outcomes were colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after 10-15 years of follow-up in intention-to-screen analyses, with first analysis after 10 years, and repeated every other year or at longer intervals. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00883792, and is ongoing.
Findings:
At 13 years of follow-up, colorectal cancer incidence was 375 colorectal cancers (1·46%) of 28 217 individuals in the screening group and 912 colorectal cancers (1·80%) of 56 366 individuals in the no-screening group. The risk ratio (RR) was 0·81 (95% CI 0·71-0·90) in intention-to-screen analyses and 0·55 (0·33-0·81) in per-protocol analyses. The risk for proximal colorectal cancer was 129 (0·51%) in the screening group versus 283 (0·56%) in the no-screening group (RR 0·91 [0·71-1·09]), and the risk for distal colorectal cancer was 224 (0·87%) in the screening group versus 563 (1·11%) in the no-screening group (RR 0·79 [0·65-0·89]; interaction p<0·0001). In men, the colorectal cancer risk was 214 (1·69%) of 14 154 in the screening group and 541 (2·19%) of 28 247 in the no-screening group (RR 0·77 [0·64 to -0·88]); in women, the risk was 161 (1·24%) of 14 063 in the screening group versus 371 (1·43%) of 28 119 in the no-screening group (RR 0·87 [0·70 to 1·02]; interaction p<0·0001). Colorectal cancer mortality was 106 (0·41%) of 28 217 in the screening group and 236 (0·47%) of 56 366 in the no-screening group (intention-to-screen RR 0·88 [0·68-1·08], per-protocol RR 0·70 [0·26-1·25]). The observed colorectal cancer mortality in the non-screening group (0·47%) was substantially lower than expected at the time of designing the trial (0·82%).
Interpretation:
One colonoscopy significantly reduced colorectal cancer incidence but not mortality over 13 years. Colorectal cancer mortality was lower in both study groups than when the trial was designed.
Funding:
The Norwegian Research Council, the Nordic Cancer Union, the Norwegian Cancer Society, and the Health Fund of South-East Norway.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
02:20Longitudinal Research
01:26Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
01:26Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...