Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Substantial aircraft contrail formation at low soot emission levels.

Nature·2026
Same author

Lipid Chain Oxidation Promotes Binding of Acute-Phase C-Reactive Protein to Cell Membranes.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Structural and Spectroscopic Characterization of Supported Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Membranes on Solid Substrates.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2024
Same author

Hyperconfined bio-inspired Polymers in Integrative Flow-Through Systems for Highly Selective Removal of Heavy Metal Ions.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Reversible Host-Guest Crosslinks in Supramolecular Hydrogels for On-Demand Mechanical Stimulation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Advanced healthcare materials·2023
Same author

Wnt/β-catenin signaling induces axial elasticity patterns of <i>Hydra</i> extracellular matrix.

iScience·2023
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Causal premise semantics.

Stefan Kaufmann1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. stefan.kaufmann@uconn.edu

Cognitive Science
|August 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study integrates causal graph theory into linguistic theory by showing how Kratzer-style semantics can model causal reasoning and counterfactuals, bridging cognitive science and linguistics.

Keywords:
CausalityCounterfactualsPremise semantics

More Related Videos

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Formal Semantics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Causal graph theory and counterfactual reasoning are prominent in cognitive science.
  • These methods have not been widely adopted in linguistic theory.
  • Formal semantic frameworks for conditionals exist, such as Kratzer-style premise semantics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how Kratzer-style premise semantics can implement causal network insights.
  • To bridge the gap between causal inference in cognitive science and formal semantics in linguistics.
  • To explore the application of causal networks to the analysis of counterfactuals in language.

Main Methods:

  • Implementing Pearl-style causal networks within Kratzer-style premise semantics.
  • Analyzing formal semantic structures for counterfactual conditional statements.
  • Focusing on the concepts of intervention and backtracking within causal networks.

Main Results:

  • Kratzer-style premise semantics provides a straightforward framework for integrating causal graph-theoretic tools.
  • The proposed implementation successfully models key aspects of causal reasoning in counterfactuals.
  • This approach offers a formal mechanism for understanding interventions and backtracking in linguistic semantics.

Conclusions:

  • Formal semantics for conditionals can effectively incorporate causal modeling techniques.
  • This integration enhances the analysis of counterfactual reasoning in linguistics.
  • The study opens new avenues for interdisciplinary research between cognitive science and linguistics.