Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Design and Characterization Methodology for Efficient Wide Range Tunable MEMS Filters
Published on: February 4, 2018
DQE of wireless digital detectors: comparative performance with differing filtration schemes
Ehsan Samei1, Simon Murphy, Olav Christianson
1Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA. samei@duke.edu
The DRX-1C detector showed the best detective quantum efficiency (DQE) among the evaluated wireless flat panel detectors. An alternative copper-aluminum filtration scheme offered comparable performance and practical advantages for portable medical imaging.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging Physics
- Radiological Technology
- Detector Performance Evaluation
Background:
- Wireless flat panel detectors are increasingly used in portable medical imaging.
- Evaluating detector performance is crucial for optimizing image quality and patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of two wireless flat panel detectors against a conventional one.
- To assess detector performance using International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards for modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE).
Main Methods:
- Acquired raw images from three detectors (DRX-1C, DRX-1, Pixium 4600) using a calibrated radiographic system.
- Employed two filtration schemes (aluminum and copper-aluminum) to meet IEC beam quality requirements (RQA5, RQA9).
- Measured MTF, NNPS, and calculated DQE according to IEC 62220-1 formalism at various exposure levels.
Main Results:
- All three DR systems exhibited comparable MTFs, with DRX-1 showing lower values at higher spatial frequencies.
- DRX-1C and Pixium detectors demonstrated superior noise performance compared to DRX-1.
- Zero-frequency DQE values were highest for DRX-1C (74% for RQA5, 50% for RQA9), followed by Pixium (63% RQA5, 42% RQA9) and DRX-1 (38% RQA5, 28% RQA9).
Conclusions:
- The DRX-1C detector displayed the best overall DQE performance.
- The alternative copper-aluminum filtration provided comparable detector ranking and practical benefits for field measurements.
Related Concept Videos
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...

