Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bias in Sunscreen SPF Testing: A Review of Published Data.

Journal of cosmetic science·2020
Same author

Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system which wirelessly transmits results to compatible insulin pumps.

Current medical research and opinion·2020
Same author

Disparate SPF Testing Methodologies Generate Similar SPFs. II. Analysis of P2 Standard Control SPF Data.

Journal of cosmetic science·2019
Same author

Non-comedogenic and non-acnegenic claim substantiation.

Journal of cosmetic science·2018
Same author

Choosing an expected sun protection factor value.

Journal of cosmetic science·2015
Same author

Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.

Diabetes technology & therapeutics·2014
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry
08:46

A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry

Published on: July 12, 2017

Disparate SPF testing methodologies generate similar SPFs.

Katherine Garzarella1, Michael Caswell

  • 1Consumer Product Testing Company, Inc., Fairfield, NJ, USA.

Journal of Cosmetic Science
|August 13, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Different regulatory methods for sunscreen efficacy testing yield similar sun protection factor (SPF) values. These findings suggest a single testing method is sufficient for global SPF labeling, simplifying regulatory compliance.

More Related Videos

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry
08:46

A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry

Published on: July 12, 2017

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Cosmetic Science
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Global regulatory agencies employ distinct methodologies for sunscreen efficacy assessment.
  • Key methods include the Food and Drug Administration-Final Monograph (FDA-FM), Australia/New Zealand (Aus/NZ), and COLIPA International (International) standards.
  • Procedural and statistical variations among these methods necessitate an evaluation of their impact on sun protection factor (SPF) values.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of procedural and statistical disparities in sunscreen efficacy testing methods on resulting SPF values.
  • To compare the SPF outcomes derived from FDA-FM, Aus/NZ, and International methods.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted simultaneous clinical trials evaluating 59 sunscreen formulations using two or three distinct SPF testing methodologies.
  • Performed a total of 135 trials, generating multiple SPF values per formulation.
  • Utilized correlation and variance analysis to compare mean SPF values across the different methods.

Main Results:

  • High correlation coefficients (≥0.94) were observed between all method pairs (International vs. FDA-FM, Aus/NZ vs. FDA-FM, International vs. Aus/NZ).
  • Minimal differences in least square mean SPF values were found: 0.12 (International vs. FDA-FM), 0.62 (Aus/NZ vs. FDA-FM), and 0.81 (International vs. Aus/NZ).
  • These differences were determined to be not clinically or statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Disparities between the FDA-FM, Aus/NZ, and International SPF testing methods do not lead to clinically significant variations in reported SPF values.
  • A single, standardized method for SPF testing could be sufficient for product labeling across these major markets.
  • This harmonization could streamline regulatory processes for sunscreen efficacy evaluation globally.