Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Quantification of intramolecular cooperativity in polynuclear spin crossover Fe(II) complexes by density functional
Sergej Rackwitz1, Wim Klopper, Volker Schünemann
1University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Physics, Erwin Schrödinger Str. 46, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany. schuene@physik.uni-kl.de wolny@physik.uni-kl.de.
Abstract:
The influence of the spin state of nearest neighbours on the spin transition of a given centre has been modelled with density functional theory methods for the linear oligomeric Fe(ii) complexes of 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole ligands. The calculated parameter Hcoop which is equal to the difference in the LS → HS spin transition energy for a centre with two LS and two HS spin nearest neighbours, respectively, was found to be always positive, varying from 15 to 35 kJ mol(-1) depending on the applied model and exchange-correlation functional. On the other hand Hcoop was found to be of negligible value for a model of a linear Fe(ii) complex of the more flexible alkylene-bis-tetrazole ligands. This corresponds well to the observed cooperative behaviour of the spin transition for the complexes of triazole derivatives and the gradual transition for the above bis-tetrazole ligands. The analysis of the bond distances in the optimised structures points towards elongation of the Fe-N bonds of the iron centre upon changing of the spin of the neighbours from low-spin to high-spin. This effect is related to the rigid nature of the bridging triazole ligand and is assumed to be the primary reason for the observed cooperativity. The presence of the next-to-nearest neighbour effects has been inferred. The effect of the softening of the Fe-N bonds in the LS centre distorted by the presence of the HS neighbours is also observed and its entropic effects are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond Theory
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...

