Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Actor-Observer Effect

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...

Factors Affecting Perception

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Room compensation for loudspeaker reproduction using a supporting source.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same author

Aurally impressed, yet not more stressed: On the relationship between audiovisual realism, social anxiety, and presence in a virtual social stress scenario.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Do all subjects fit the same recognition memory model? Comparisons of continuous, discrete, and hybrid models using extended multinomial processing trees.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same author

Perceptual compensation of the reproduction room for single-source Ambisonics recordings.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same author

Combined assessment of auditory distance perception and externalization.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Same author

Impact of Visual Virtual Scene and Localization Task on Auditory Distance Perception in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025

Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same journal

Listeners near-optimally integrate acoustic and semantic cues in spoken word recognition: Evidence from experiments manipulating cue order and reliability.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Apparent causality affects perceived simultaneity.

Armin Kohlrausch¹, Rob van Eijk, James F Juola

¹Human-Technology Interaction Group, School of Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, a.kohlrausch@tue.nl.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

|August 15, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that perceived causality, not visual predictability, influences audio-visual synchrony perception. Causal relationships in stimuli, rather than predictive information, alter subjective simultaneity judgments.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Auditory Perception

Background:

Audio-visual synchrony perception is crucial for event interpretation.
Previous studies suggest visual predictability and implied causality influence synchrony judgments.
A need exists to disentangle the independent effects of predictability and causality.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether visual predictive information or implied causality primarily drives shifts in audio-visual synchrony perception.
To differentiate the contributions of predictability and causality to subjective simultaneity.

Main Methods:

An experiment was designed to present audio-visual stimuli with varying levels of visual predictive information and implied causality.
Participants judged the simultaneity of auditory and visual events.
Statistical analyses were performed to assess the impact of predictability and causality independently.

Main Results:

Shifts in subjective simultaneity were fully accounted for by changes in implied causal relations.
Visual predictive information did not provide any additional explanatory value for synchrony perception.
The findings suggest causality is the dominant factor influencing perceived synchrony.

Conclusions:

Implied causality, not visual predictability, is the key factor modulating audio-visual synchrony perception.
Observed shifts in subjective simultaneity are rooted in early multimodal integration processes, not response strategy changes.
This research deepens our understanding of how the brain integrates multisensory information for event perception.