Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variable and constant performance errors within a group of individuals.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Individual differences in various parameters of motor learning.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Effectiveness of pre-flight oxygen breathing in preventing decompression sickness.

The Journal of aviation medicine·2010
Same author

The role of exercise in altitude pain.

The American journal of physiology·2010
Same author

Altitude pain; a study of individual differences in susceptibility to bends, chokes, and related symptoms.

The Journal of aviation medicine·2010
Same author

The prevention of altitude pain by preselection.

The Journal of aviation medicine·2010
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Absolute Error vs "E" in Target Accuracy.

F M Henry1

  • 1a Department of Physical Education , University of California , Berkeley.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|August 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The composite error model (E) closely approximates unity, but variable error (v) is not fully captured in absolute error scores (Ae). Further analysis is needed to understand this representation gap.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Measurement theory
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Composite error models are used to analyze measurement inaccuracies.
  • Understanding the contribution of variable and constant errors is crucial for accurate assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a composite error model (E = √(v² + c²)) in representing measurement errors.
  • To determine if variable error (v) is adequately captured within absolute error scores (Ae).

Main Methods:

  • A composite error model (E) was formulated using variable error (v) and constant error (c).
  • Multiple correlation was employed to assess the relationship between the composite error and absolute error scores (Ae).

Main Results:

  • The composite error model (E) demonstrated a multiple correlation (R) approximating unity, indicating a strong overall fit.
  • A lower multiple correlation was observed when assessing the representation of variable error (v) within absolute error scores (Ae), suggesting inadequacy.

Conclusions:

  • While the composite error model provides a robust approximation, the variable component of error is not fully represented in absolute error scores.
  • Further investigation is warranted to refine the assessment of variable error components in measurement data.