Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch01:15

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

The history of therapeutic communication can be traced back to Florence Nightingale, who emphasized the importance of developing trusting relationships with patients. She taught that the presence of nurses with patients results in therapeutic healing.
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seeing the World Through a Dark Lens: The Dark Core of Personality and Its Relation to Primal World Beliefs.

Journal of personality·2026
Same author

Reconceptualizing ethically and socially aversive ("dark") personality traits.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Four big problems of big five agreeableness.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Aversive societal conditions explain differences in "dark" personality across countries and US states.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

On the relationship between recognition judgments and truth judgments: Memory states moderate the recognition-based truth effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Waking rest during retention facilitates memory consolidation, but so does social media use.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

An experimental validation method for questioning techniques that assess sensitive issues.

Morten Moshagen1, Benjamin E Hilbig1, Edgar Erdfelder1

  • 1University of Mannheim, <location>Germany</location>

Experimental Psychology
|August 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel experimental method to accurately measure the true prevalence of sensitive behaviors. This approach provides a crucial external validation criterion for assessing the validity of different survey techniques.

Keywords:
indirect questioningrandomized-response techniquesocial desirabilityvalidity

More Related Videos

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Psychological research methods
  • Social psychology
  • Behavioral science

Background:

  • Estimating the prevalence of sensitive behaviors is challenging due to socially desirable responding.
  • Existing bias-reduction techniques (e.g., indirect questioning) require substantial resources and their validity compared to direct questions is often unclear.
  • Comparative validation studies lack a true criterion, limiting assessment of method validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and demonstrate a novel experimental method for measuring the true prevalence of sensitive behaviors.
  • To establish an external validation criterion for evaluating the accuracy of different survey methods.
  • To overcome limitations of comparative validation in sensitive issue research.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a simple experimental procedure to elicit normatively problematic behavior.
  • Ensuring conclusive knowledge of the prevalence rate of the elicited behavior within the experiment.
  • Utilizing the experimentally determined prevalence as an external validation criterion.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method successfully established a known prevalence rate for a sensitive behavior.
  • This experimentally derived prevalence served as a valid external criterion.
  • Empirical demonstration confirmed the feasibility and utility of the method.

Conclusions:

  • The developed experimental method offers a reliable way to measure the true prevalence of sensitive behaviors.
  • This approach provides a much-needed external validation criterion for survey methodology.
  • The findings have significant implications for improving the accuracy of prevalence estimates in sensitive research areas.