Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Cardiac transplantation after bridged therapy with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices
Salil V Deo1, Kiick Sung2, Richard C Daly1
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, USA.
Insights
Heart transplantation after continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support shows excellent outcomes. Bridged patients experience comparable survival rates to direct transplant recipients, demonstrating the viability of CF-LVADs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- End-stage heart failure necessitates cardiac transplantation.
- Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) bridge patients to transplant.
- Outcomes after transplantation post-LVAD were historically uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate cardiac transplantation outcomes in patients bridged with CF-LVADs.
- To compare these outcomes with patients undergoing direct cardiac transplantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 106 cardiac transplantations from June 2007 to January 2012.
- Comparison of 37 CF-LVAD bridged patients (BTx) with 70 direct transplant patients (Tx).
Main Results:
- Median LVAD support duration was 227 days.
- In-hospital mortality was comparable: 5% for BTx vs. 1% for Tx (p=0.25).
- Estimated 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates were similar between BTx and Tx groups (p=0.50).
Conclusions:
- Cardiac transplantation following LVAD implantation yields excellent results.
- Long-term support with CF-LVADs (up to a year) is feasible with good post-transplant outcomes.
Introduction:
Cardiac transplantation is an effective surgical therapy for end-stage heart failure. Patients (pts) may need to be bridged with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) while on the transplant list as logistic factors like organ availability are unknown. Cardiac transplantation post-LVAD can be a surgically challenging procedure and outcome in these pts is perceived to be poorer based on experience with earlier generation pulsatile flow pumps. Data from a single institution comparing these pts with those undergoing direct transplantation in the present era of continuous flow device therapy are limited.
Aim:
Evaluate results of cardiac transplantation in pts bridged with a CF-LVAD (BTx) and compare outcomes with pts undergoing direct transplantation (Tx) in a single institution.
Results:
From June 2007 till January 2012, 106 pts underwent cardiac transplantation. Among these, 37 (35%) pts (51±11 years; 85% male) were bridged with a CF-LVAD (BTx), while 70 (65%) comprised the Tx group (53±12 years; 72% males). The median duration of LVAD support was 227 (153,327) days. During the period of LVAD support, 10/37 (27%) pts were upgraded to status 1A and all were successfully transplanted. Median hospital stay in the BTx (14 days) was slightly longer than the Tx group (12 days) but not statistically significant (p=0.21). In-hospital mortality in the BTx (5%) and Tx (1%) were comparable (p=0.25). Estimated late survival in the BTx cohort was 94±7, 90±10 and 83±16% at the end of one, two and three years, respectively which was comparable to 97±4%, 93±6% and 89±9% for the Tx group (p=0.50).
Conclusion:
Cardiac transplantation after LVAD implant can be performed with excellent results. Patients can be supported on the left ventricular assist device even for periods close to a year with good outcome after cardiac transplantation.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

