Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Measuring comorbidity in cardiovascular research: a systematic review
Harleah G Buck1, Jabar A Akbar, Sarah Jingying Zhang
1School of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, 201 Health and Human Development East, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Insights
Comorbidity measurement in cardiovascular disease studies is limited, often using unsubstantiated disease lists. This hinders accurate assessment of comorbidity
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research Methodology
Background:
- Accurate comorbidity measurement is crucial for understanding cardiovascular disease (CVD) impact.
- Current methods may not fully capture the complexity of co-occurring conditions in CVD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate comorbidity assessment in clinical trials for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and stroke.
- To identify current practices and limitations in measuring comorbidity in cardiovascular research.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies.
- Searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Web of Science databases.
- Data extraction by at least two independent reviewers.
Main Results:
- 26 studies (8 AMI, 11 HF, 7 stroke) were included from 1432 abstracts.
- Only 5 studies utilized a validated instrument; others used unvalidated disease lists.
- Comorbidity data sources were inconsistent, with 35% not reporting sources; no improvement over time.
Conclusions:
- Comorbidity measurement in CVD research lacks standardized instruments and clear rationale.
- Current practices likely underestimate the true impact of comorbidity in AMI, HF, and stroke.
- Standardized and validated methods are needed for accurate comorbidity assessment in cardiovascular research.
Abstract:
Background. Everything known about the roles, relationships, and repercussions of comorbidity in cardiovascular disease is shaped by how comorbidity is currently measured. Objectives. To critically examine how comorbidity is measured in randomized controlled trials or clinical trials and prospective observational studies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or stroke. Design. Systematic review of studies of hospitalized adults from MEDLINE CINAHL, PsychINFO, and ISI Web of Science Social Science databases. At least two reviewers screened and extracted all data. Results. From 1432 reviewed abstracts, 26 studies were included (AMI n = 8, HF n = 11, stroke n = 7). Five studies used an instrument to measure comorbidity while the remaining used the presence or absence of an unsubstantiated list of individual diseases. Comorbidity data were obtained from 1-4 different sources with 35% of studies not reporting the source. A year-by-year analysis showed no changes in measurement. Conclusions. The measurement of comorbidity remains limited to a list of conditions without stated rationale or standards increasing the likelihood that the true impact is underestimated.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures