Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.

Brain research·2015

Same author

The search for "common sense": an electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Same author

Late positive event-related potentials after commissural section in humans.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Same author

Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Same author

Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Same author

An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

J W King¹, M Kutas

¹University of California, San Diego.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

|August 22, 2013

Summary

Syntactic complexity in sentences affects brain activity, with differences observed between good and poor comprehenders. Object-relative sentences showed left anterior negativity, while subject-relative sentences had a slow frontal positivity indicating easier processing.

More Related Videos

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Published on: October 25, 2019

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Psycholinguistics
Neuroscience

Background:

Reading sentences involves complex cognitive processes, including syntactic parsing and working memory.
Individual differences in reading comprehension abilities can influence neural processing during sentence reading.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the neural correlates of syntactic complexity during sentence comprehension.
To examine how working memory demands influence event-related potentials (ERPs).
To explore differences in neural processing between good and poor comprehenders.

Main Methods:

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 24 undergraduates.
Participants read sentences varying in syntactic complexity (Object vs. Subject Relative sentences).
Analyses were conducted at both single-word and multiword levels.

Main Results:

Significant differences in ERPs were found based on sentence type at both single-word and multiword levels.
Object-relative sentences elicited a left anterior negativity (LAN) between 300-500 msec.
Subject-relative sentences exhibited a slow frontal positivity, more pronounced in good comprehenders, suggesting easier integration.

Conclusions:

Syntactic complexity and working memory demands modulate neural activity during sentence processing.
A slow frontal positivity may serve as an index of processing ease or integration.
Individual differences in comprehension ability are reflected in distinct neural processing patterns.