Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
Defining Psychology01:24

Defining Psychology

Psychology is the scientific discipline dedicated to understanding both observable behavior and the internal mental processes underlying such behavior. It aims to comprehend human nature and apply this understanding to solve practical problems, enhance well-being, and improve societal outcomes. An example of psychology's application is the study of prosocial behavior, such as why and under what conditions individuals might help strangers in need. This process involves describing observed...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Greater bullying and social exclusion are linked to higher internalising symptoms from ages 10 to 21.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Joint trajectories of brain atrophy, white matter hyperintensities and cognition quantify brain maintenance.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Cognitive-affective and behavioral pain mechanisms in individuals with chronic low back pain: a network analysis.

Pain·2026
Same author

Computational Modeling of Decision Making Enhances the Adversity Researcher's Toolbox.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Mapping the dynamics of idiographic network models to the network theory of psychopathology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

A theory-construction methodology for network theories in psychology.

Psychological methods·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
07:43

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide.

Rogier A Kievit1, Willem E Frankenhuis, Lourens J Waldorp

  • 1Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Medical Research Council - Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit Cambridge, UK.

Frontiers in Psychology
|August 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Simpson's paradox, where population trends reverse in subgroups, is common in psychology. Recognizing this statistical anomaly prevents harmful misinterpretations of research data.

Keywords:
Simpson's paradoxecological fallacymeasurementparadoxreductionismstatistical inference

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking
13:40

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking

Published on: December 16, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
07:43

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking
13:40

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking

Published on: December 16, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Simpson's paradox describes a reversal of an association's direction at the population level within subgroups.
  • Psychologists often incorrectly dismiss this statistical phenomenon as anomalous.
  • Misinterpretations of Simpson's paradox can lead to significant negative consequences in research and practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the prevalence and impact of Simpson's paradox in psychological research.
  • To identify conditions under which Simpson's paradox is likely to occur.
  • To provide statistical and psychometric solutions for detecting and managing Simpson's paradox.

Main Methods:

  • Review of findings across diverse psychological subfields including cognitive neuroscience, behavior genetics, and clinical psychology.
  • Analysis of simulation studies to understand paradox occurrence.
  • Development of statistical markers and psychometric tools for paradox detection.

Main Results:

  • Simpson's paradox is more frequent than commonly believed across various psychological domains.
  • The paradox is most likely when drawing inferences across different explanatory levels (e.g., population to subgroup).
  • Proposed statistical markers and R toolbox aid in identifying and addressing the paradox.

Conclusions:

  • Simpson's paradox frequently leads to incorrect interpretations in psychological research.
  • Explicitly modeling for Simpson's paradox prevents erroneous conclusions.
  • Addressing this paradox enhances the understanding of data and its real-world implications.