Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Computational Modeling of Decision Making Enhances the Adversity Researcher's Toolbox.
Stefan Vermeent1, Anna-Lena Schubert2, Willem E Frankenhuis1,3
1Evolutionary and Population Biology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam.
Computational modeling, specifically the drift diffusion model, offers deeper insights into how adversity impacts cognitive processes like executive functioning and explore-exploit tradeoffs, moving beyond basic performance metrics.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Computational Neuroscience
- Decision Science
Background:
- Significant progress in understanding adversity's influence on cognition.
- Current research relies heavily on raw performance metrics (e.g., response times, accuracy).
- These metrics offer limited insight into underlying cognitive processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- Advocate for the integration of computational modeling in adversity research.
- Highlight the utility of the drift diffusion model for analyzing cognitive processes.
- Explore applications in executive functioning and explore-exploit tradeoffs.
Main Methods:
- Focus on the drift diffusion model (DDM) as a computational tool.
- DDM quantifies information processing efficiency, response caution, and bias.
- Examines decision-making in the context of executive functioning and explore-exploit tradeoffs.
Main Results:
- The drift diffusion model provides a framework to analyze cognitive processes affected by adversity.
- Offers a more nuanced understanding beyond simple performance outcomes.
- Identifies specific parameters (e.g., processing efficiency, bias) influenced by adversity.
Conclusions:
- Computational modeling, particularly DDM, is crucial for advancing adversity research.
- Enables a deeper investigation into the cognitive mechanisms underlying adversity exposure.
- Suggests future research directions for integrating advanced modeling techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Counterfactual Thinking
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...
Reason and Intuition