Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Task experience influences coordinative structures and performance variables in learning a slalom ski-simulator task.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2018
Same author

The pattern of coupling dynamics between postural motion, isotonic hand movements and physiological tremor.

Neuroscience letters·2014
Same author

Motor learning without knowledge of results through the development of a response recognition mechanism.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Variability of practice and transfer of training.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Performance criteria for stabilometer learning.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Recall and recognition in motor learning.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

More on absolute error, etc.

K M Newell1

  • 1a Institute for Child Behavior and Development , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|August 23, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Absolute error is a meaningful performance measure, especially when other error metrics are equal. Researchers should consider using absolute error for motor performance analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Motor control and performance analysis
  • Statistical measurement in behavioral science

Background:

  • Traditional error scores in motor performance research can be ambiguous.
  • Algebraic and variable error means may not sufficiently differentiate group performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To argue for the statistical and conceptual validity of absolute error as a performance measure.
  • To highlight situations where absolute error is the primary dependent variable for distinguishing groups.
  • To advocate for the appropriate use of absolute error in motor performance research.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual and statistical argumentation.
  • Analysis of error score properties in group comparisons.
  • Examination of experimental objectives in motor performance studies.

Main Results:

  • Absolute error can be the sole meaningful differentiator when algebraic and variable error means are equivalent between groups.
  • Absolute error aligns with the experimental goal of minimizing performance deviations.
  • Demonstrates the statistical grounds for employing absolute error.

Conclusions:

  • Absolute error is a statistically sound and conceptually relevant metric for assessing motor performance.
  • Its use is particularly appropriate when other error measures yield similar results.
  • Researchers measuring motor performance via error scores should judiciously employ absolute error.