Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Ultra-early intravenous stroke thrombolysis: do all patients benefit similarly?
Daniel Strbian1, Peter Ringleb, Patrik Michel
1From the Departments of Neurology and Stroke Units, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (D.S., T.T.); Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (P.R., W.H.); Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.M., A.E.); Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany (L.B., M.K.); Department of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (J.O., H.N.); Department of Neurology, University Lille Nord de France (K.M., D.L.); Department of Neurology and Stroke Units, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (D.J.S., H.G., S.E.); Department of Neurology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (S.J., B.W., H.P.M.); Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínic Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain (V.O., A.C.); and Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland (B.W.).
Background And Purpose:
We previously reported increased benefit and reduced mortality after ultra-early stroke thrombolysis in a single center. We now explored in a large multicenter cohort whether extra benefit of treatment within 90 minutes from symptom onset is uniform across predefined stroke severity subgroups, as compared with later thrombolysis.
Methods:
Prospectively collected data of consecutive ischemic stroke patients who received i.v. thrombolysis in 10 European stroke centers were merged. Logistic regression tested association between treatment delays, as well as excellent 3-month outcome (modified Rankin scale, 0-1), and mortality. The association was tested separately in tertiles of baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Results:
In the whole cohort (n=6856), shorter onset-to-treatment time as a continuous variable was significantly associated with excellent outcome (P<0.001). Every fifth patient had onset-to-treatment time≤90 minutes, and these patients had lower frequency of intracranial hemorrhage. After adjusting for age, sex, admission glucose level, and year of treatment, onset-to-treatment time≤90 minutes was associated with excellent outcome in patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 7 to 12 (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.70; P=0.004), but not in patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale>12 (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.32; P=0.99) and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 0 to 6 (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.39; P=0.80). In the latter, however, an independent association (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.01; P<0.01) was found when considering modified Rankin scale 0 as outcome (to overcome the possible ceiling effect from spontaneous better prognosis of patients with mild symptoms). Ultra-early treatment was not associated with mortality.
Conclusions:
I.v. thrombolysis within 90 minutes is, compared with later thrombolysis, strongly and independently associated with excellent outcome in patients with moderate and mild stroke severity.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

