Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

05:35
Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
A is for aphorism--'good judgment comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgment'
1Discipline of General Practice, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, QLD, Australia. r.farley1@uq.edu.au
Australian Family Physician
|August 24, 2013
Summary
Physicians gain experience through medical errors, but this learning process can be costly. This study explores the validity of the aphorism that poor judgment leads to valuable experience.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Patient Safety
Background:
- The aphorism 'Good judgment comes from experience; experience comes from bad judgment' suggests a learning pathway for physicians.
- Medical errors and poor clinical decisions can lead to adverse patient outcomes and increased healthcare costs.
- Understanding the role of experience, particularly from negative events, is crucial for improving medical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the truthfulness and implications of Dr. Kerr L. White's aphorism in the context of medical practice.
- To explore the relationship between medical errors, physician experience, and the development of sound clinical judgment.
- To discuss the potential benefits and significant risks associated with learning from adverse events in medicine.
Main Methods:
- This is a conceptual analysis and discussion piece, not an empirical study.
- It involves a critical review of the stated aphorism and its relevance to medical training and practice.
- The analysis draws on established principles of medical education and patient safety.
Main Results:
- The aphorism highlights a paradoxical but recognized aspect of clinical learning where negative experiences can foster improved judgment.
- However, the 'cost' of such experience, in terms of patient harm and physician stress, is substantial and ethically concerning.
- Relying on learning from bad judgment is an inefficient and potentially dangerous model for medical education.
Conclusions:
- While experience, including that gained from errors, can refine clinical judgment, it is not a desirable or ethically sound primary method of medical training.
- Strategies to minimize medical errors and promote learning from near misses are essential for safer and more effective healthcare.
- The focus should be on creating a learning environment that facilitates judgment development without compromising patient well-being.
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
First Impression
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

