Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|August 27, 2013
Summary
This study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to show that the brain processes semantic meaning and grammatical structure separately. Different types of grammatical errors elicit unique brain responses, supporting distinct language subsystems.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psycholinguistics
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Language comprehension is theorized to involve separate semantic and grammatical processing subsystems.
- Empirical data from various studies support this modular view of language faculty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural correlates of semantic and grammatical processing using event-related potentials (ERPs).
- To differentiate brain activity patterns associated with semantic anomalies versus various types of syntactic violations.
Main Methods:
- Recorded ERPs from 40 participants reading sentences with semantic anomalies or syntactic violations (phrase structure, specificity, subjacency).
- Analyzed ERPs for distinct timing and scalp distribution patterns corresponding to different linguistic violations.
Main Results:
- Semantic anomalies elicited a bilateral N400 potential over posterior regions.
- Phrase structure violations affected early left anterior negativity (N125) and later left temporal-parietal negativity.
- Specificity violations resulted in a slow negative potential over anterior left hemisphere.
- Subjacency violations produced a widespread bilateral positivity.
Conclusions:
- Distinct ERP patterns for different linguistic violations provide biological evidence for separate semantic and grammatical processing systems.
- Findings support theories distinguishing grammatical rules and constraints, and the modularity of the language faculty.


