Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Data fabrication and falsification and empiricist philosophy of science
1NIEHS/NIH, 111 Alexander Drive, Mail Drop CU 03, Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA, resnikd@niehs.nih.gov.
Abstract:
Scientists have rules pertaining to data fabrication and falsification that are enforced with significant punishments, such as loss of funding, termination of employment, or imprisonment. These rules pertain to data that describe observable and unobservable entities. In this commentary I argue that scientists would not adopt rules that impose harsh penalties on researchers for data fabrication or falsification unless they believed that an aim of scientific research is to develop true theories and hypotheses about entities that exist, including unobservable ones. This argument presents a challenge for constructive empiricists, such as van Fraassen. Constructive empiricists need to be able to explain why rules pertaining to data fabrication and falsification do not threaten their philosophy of science.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

