Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Measuring Local Anaphylaxis in Mice
Published on: October 14, 2014
Longitudinal study of 954 patients with stinging insect anaphylaxis
Susan A Rudders1, Sunday Clark, Wenhui Wei
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Asthma and Allergy, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. srudders@lifespan.org
Background:
Stinging insect anaphylaxis (SIA) is a common cause of anaphylaxis and is potentially life-threatening.
Objectives:
To examine US patients with an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for SIA to evaluate postdischarge follow-up care.
Methods:
We identified all patients with an ED visit or hospitalization for SIA during 2002-2008 in the MarketScan Database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (index date was the initial ED visit or hospitalization). Patients were required to have continuous full insurance coverage for 1 year or more before and after index. We examined patient factors during the preindex period, characteristics of the index event, and outcomes during the postindex period. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of receiving preventive anaphylaxis care.
Results:
We identified 954 patients with an ED visit or hospitalization for SIA (mean [SD] age, 46 [19] years; 41% female). A total of 85% of patients were discharged directly from the ED. For those hospitalized, the mean hospital stay was 1 day, and 50% spent time in the intensive care unit. Cardiorespiratory failure occurred in 27% of those hospitalized. During the postindex period, 69% filled 1 or more epinephrine autoinjector prescription, but only 14% had 1 or more allergist/immunologist visit. Independent factors associated with receiving preventive anaphylaxis care during the postindex period were higher household income, no ED visit (for any reason) in the preindex period, and no cardiorespiratory arrest or failure during the index event.
Conclusion:
Although two-thirds of patients filled a prescription for an epinephrine autoinjector after an ED visit or hospitalization for SIA, only 14% of patients received follow-up care by an allergist/immunologist. This missed opportunity to provide venom immunotherapy, an essentially curative therapy, unnecessarily places patients at risk for recurrent anaphylaxis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
Allergic Reactions
Allergic Drug Reactions
Drug Toxicity: Allergic Reactions
Hypersensitivity Reactions: Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...

