Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
06:48
Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation.
Shabnam Rehman1, Syed Johar Raza, Andrew P Stegemann
1Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
International Journal of Surgery (London, England)
|September 3, 2013
Summary
Robotic Surgical Simulator (RoSS) training is cost-effective, preventing significant revenue loss and reducing animal lab expenses. This simulation-based approach enhances robotic surgical skills training programs.
Area of Science:
- Medical Simulation
- Surgical Education Technology
- Robotic Surgery
Background:
- Robot-assisted surgery requires specialized training.
- Simulation-based training offers a controlled environment for skill acquisition.
- Evaluating the economic impact of surgical simulators is crucial for adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of the Robotic Surgical Simulator (RoSS).
- To quantify the financial benefits of using RoSS for robotic surgical skills training.
Main Methods:
- A cost analysis was performed on RoSS utilization over one year.
- Trainee hours on the RoSS console were recorded and converted to potential OR revenue loss.
- Mechanical durability of the RoSS was evaluated.
Main Results:
- 105 trainees accumulated 361 hours on RoSS, equivalent to 73 radical prostatectomy cases.
- RoSS training prevented an estimated $600,000 in potential revenue loss.
- 72 animal lab sessions were simulated, avoiding costs exceeding $72,000, excluding additional expenses.
Conclusions:
- The Robotic Surgical Simulator (RoSS) is a cost-effective tool.
- Implementing RoSS supports simulation-based training programs for robotic surgery.
- RoSS training enhances surgical skills while managing costs effectively.
