Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Visual System01:26

Visual System

Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
Vision01:24

Vision

Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Internal Consistency of Self-report Anxiety Measures for Autistic Adults Without Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2026
Same author

Reality monitoring across disorders of reality: Systematic and narrative reviews of dissociation and psychosis.

Journal of psychiatric research·2026
Same author

Three international studies on pure coordination games: Adaptable solutions when intuitions are presumed to vary.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

A competitive edge: how social cues and spatial congruence influence joint attention in addressed or witnessed interactions.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Longitudinal development of theory of mind in adolescence and its associations with fiction reading experience.

Developmental psychology·2025
Same author

Defining key concepts for mental state attribution.

Communications psychology·2024
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Children's narrow learning bottleneck accelerates the emergence of statistical properties of language.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes.

Andrew Surtees1, Ian Apperly, Dana Samson

  • 1Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, IPSY - Place, Cardinal Mercier 10 bte L3.05.01,1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Cognition
|September 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Perspective-taking processes differ based on mental rotation needs. Early-developing (level-1) judgments, like object visibility, do not require mental rotation, unlike later-developing (level-2) spatial judgments.

Keywords:
Spatial perspective-takingTheory of MindVisual perspective-taking

More Related Videos

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Perspective-taking involves understanding another's viewpoint.
  • Existing tasks differentiate based on visual/spatial content and level-1/level-2 judgment types.
  • Prior research indicated left/right judgments require mental rotation, while visibility judgments do not.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether visual/spatial content or judgment level (level-1 vs. level-2) is more critical in determining the need for mental rotation in perspective-taking.
  • To clarify the underlying cognitive processes in different types of perspective-taking tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using four novel perspective-taking tasks.
  • Tasks orthogonally crossed content (visual vs. spatial) and judgment type (level-1 vs. level-2).
  • Judgments assessed included spatial orientation (left/right, front/behind) and visual perception (visibility).

Main Results:

  • Level-2 judgments (e.g., object appearance, left/right orientation) necessitated egocentric mental rotation.
  • Level-1 judgments (e.g., front/behind, visibility) did not involve mental rotation.
  • The need for mental rotation was primarily associated with the level of judgment, not the visual or spatial nature of the content.

Conclusions:

  • Initial perspective-taking strategies are largely independent of whether judgments are visual or spatial.
  • Early-developing (level-1) perspective-taking abilities are characterized by processes that bypass the need for mental rotation.
  • Findings refine our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying different forms of social cognition and spatial reasoning.