Disclosing incidental findings in brain research: the rights of minors in decision-making

Nina C Di Pietro1, Judy Illes

  • 1National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; NeuroDevNet Inc., University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Insights

Researchers reviewed studies on incidental findings (IFs) in children's brain MRI scans. They found a need to involve minors in decisions about disclosing brain abnormalities, especially those of low clinical significance.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Ethics
  • Pediatric Research

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is crucial for pediatric brain development research.
  • Incidental findings (IFs) in pediatric MRI research pose unique ethical and practical challenges.
  • Existing guidelines for IFs in adults are insufficient for minors in minimal risk research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing literature on incidental findings in minors undergoing MRI.
  • To identify ethical concerns and knowledge gaps regarding IFs in pediatric research.
  • To propose a framework for managing IFs in minors.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review was conducted.
  • Twenty-one papers explicitly focusing on incidental findings in minors were analyzed.
  • The review examined practical issues and ethical considerations.

Main Results:

  • The reviewed literature adequately addressed practical issues like consent, screening, clinical significance, cost, and risk.
  • There was limited discussion on involving minors in disclosure decisions for IFs, particularly those with low clinical significance.
  • Ethical discourse often overlooked the continuum of maturity and minors' rights.

Conclusions:

  • A capacity-adjusted framework is proposed for managing incidental findings in pediatric research.
  • This framework integrates practical management with respect for minors' rights and decision-making capacity.
  • Involving competent minors in disclosure decisions is paramount, respecting their autonomy.

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...