Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique helps...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Microbial characterization of oral microbiome in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Five genome sequences of bacterial environmental isolates from Gilkey Glacier, Juneau Icefield, Alaska.

Microbiology resource announcements·2026

Same author

Brain endothelial cells orchestrate a neuroprotective antiviral state in the CNS in response to peripheral viral pattern sensing.

Immunity·2026

Same author

Spatial remodeling of bone marrow architecture defines tissue-state signatures of disease activity and therapeutic response in myelodysplastic neoplasms.

Leukemia·2026

Same author

Targeting macrophage ferritin heavy chain mitigates ferroptosis and lung injury in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Derivation of elephant induced pluripotent stem cells.

Nature methods·2026

Same journal

Defined bacterial consortium highlights the impact of intestinal bacteria on DNA methylation and tumorigenesis.

Genome biology·2026

Same journal

Somatic mobility of transposons is explosive and shaped by distinct integration biases in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Genome biology·2026

Same journal

UK Biobank whole-genome sequencing reveals robust contributions of rare variants to complex-trait heritability.

Genome biology·2026

Same journal

A one-week automated genome-wide optical pooled screen using OttoSeq.

Genome biology·2026

Same journal

Integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic profiling of the host response in human malaria.

Genome biology·2026

Same journal

Centromeric satellite expansion drives genome evolution in the snowy owl.

Genome biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data.

Franck Rapaport, Raya Khanin, Yupu Liang

|September 12, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) differential gene expression analysis methods. Increasing biological replicates, not sequencing depth, significantly enhances detection power for gene expression studies.

More Related Videos

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Genomics

Background:

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is crucial for gene expression analysis.
Numerous computational methods exist for analyzing RNA-seq data.
Evaluating these methods is essential for accurate biological insights.

Purpose of the Study:

To comprehensively evaluate common computational methods for differential gene expression analysis in RNA-seq data.
To assess method performance across key features like normalization and detection accuracy.
To compare RNA-seq specific methods with adapted array-based methods.

Main Methods:

Utilized the SEQC benchmark dataset and ENCODE data for evaluation.
Assessed methods based on normalization strategies.
Examined differential expression detection accuracy, including scenarios with zero detectable expression.
Compared performance of RNA-seq specific versus adapted array-based methods.

Main Results:

Significant performance differences were observed among the evaluated methods.
Array-based methods adapted for RNA-seq performed comparably to RNA-seq specific methods.
Increasing the number of replicate samples substantially improved detection power.
Increased sequencing depth showed less impact on detection power compared to replicates.

Conclusions:

Method selection impacts differential gene expression analysis outcomes.
Adapted array-based methods offer a viable alternative for RNA-seq analysis.
Replicate number is a critical factor for enhancing statistical power in RNA-seq studies.
Prioritizing biological replicates over sequencing depth is recommended for robust gene expression analysis.