Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

10:41
Implantation of Osmotic Pumps and Induction of Stress to Establish a Symptomatic, Pharmacological Mouse Model for DYT/PARK-ATP1A3 Dystonia
Published on: September 12, 2020
Task force report: scales for screening and evaluating tremor: critique and recommendations
Rodger Elble1, Peter Bain, Maria João Forjaz
1Department of Neurology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.
Movement Disorders : Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society
|September 17, 2013
Summary
A Movement Disorder Society task force reviewed tremor assessment scales. Five tremor severity scales, one ADL scale, one quality-of-life scale, and one screening tool are recommended, but further analysis is needed.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Clinical Assessment
- Movement Disorders
Background:
- Tremor assessment relies on various rating scales and screening instruments.
- Standardized and validated tools are crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
- Previous reviews have not comprehensively evaluated available tremor assessment scales.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and classify existing rating scales and screening instruments for tremor assessment.
- To identify recommended scales based on predefined criteria including availability, use, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
- To guide future research and clinical practice in tremor assessment.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search of PubMed.gov was conducted to identify relevant scales.
- Seven tremor severity scales, six ADL/disability scales, four quality-of-life scales, and five screening instruments were identified.
- Scales were evaluated for availability, use, acceptability, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change, and classified as recommended, suggested, or listed.
Main Results:
- Five tremor severity scales, one ADL/disability scale, one quality-of-life scale, and one screening instrument met the criteria for recommendation.
- Specific recommended scales include the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale and the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire.
- All reviewed scales require further comprehensive analysis, particularly regarding sensitivity to change.
Conclusions:
- Several validated scales are recommended for tremor assessment, but none are perfect.
- Further research should focus on refining existing recommended scales rather than developing new ones.
- Improved sensitivity to change analysis is needed to optimize scale utility in clinical trials and patient care.
