Clinical efficacy of dual electrode systems for endocardial cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia: a prospective...

In order to eliminate the need for epicardial electrodes, two large transvenous catheter electrodes or one catheter and one extrathoracic patch electrode have been proposed as alternative electrode configurations for defibrillation and ventricular tachycardia cardioversion by implantable cardioverter/defibrillators. We compared the efficacy and safety of endocardial shocks delivered through these two electrode systems in man in a prospective randomized crossover study. Twelve patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and heart disease undergoing electrophysiologic study were evaluated. A transvenous tripolar cardioversion electrode catheter with a large distal defibrillation electrode (surface area, 400 mm2) and proximal defibrillation electrode (surface area, 800 mm2) was positioned in the right ventricular apex with a cutaneous patch electrode placed on the cardiac apex. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was induced at electrophysiologic study. Shocks were delivered using two catheter electrodes only (right ventricular cathode and right atrial anode = method I), and one catheter electrode and cutaneous patch (right ventricular cathode and cutaneous apical patch anode = method II). Synchronized monophasic shocks were delivered using three preselected protocols based on ventricular tachycardia cycle length and morphology. Initial shock energies were 25 joules for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, 15 joules for monomorphic rapid ventricular tachycardia (cycle length less than or equal to 300 msec), and 5 joules for monomorphic slow ventricular tachycardia (cycle length greater than 300 msec). Ventricular tachycardia was reinduced and shock energies titrated until cardioversion threshold was obtained. Identical ventricular tachycardia episodes were treated with both methods at each energy level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)