Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models00:57

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

Physiological pharmacokinetic models, often called flow-limited or perfusion models, typically assume a swift drug distribution between tissue and venous blood, creating a rapid drug equilibrium. This premise is based on the idea that drug diffusion is extremely fast, and the cell membrane presents no barrier to drug permeation. In this scenario, where no drug binding occurs, the drug concentration in the tissue equals that of the venous blood leaving the tissue. This greatly simplifies the...
Three-Compartment Open Model01:06

Three-Compartment Open Model

The three-compartment open model is a pharmacokinetic model used to describe the distribution and elimination of drugs following extravascular administration. It comprises a central compartment representing the plasma and two peripheral compartments. The highly perfused peripheral compartment represents organs and tissues with a rich blood supply, such as the liver, kidneys, and lungs. The scarcely perfused peripheral compartment represents tissues with lower blood supply, such as adipose...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model01:14

Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model

The link model is a fundamental pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) approach to account for delayed drug responses when the observed effect does not immediately correlate with the drug's plasma concentration peak. This delay is mathematically addressed by introducing an effect compartment concentration, Ce, which is kinetically linked to the plasma concentration, Cp, via a first-order rate constant, ke0. The linkage allows for a more accurate prediction of drug effects over time. A higher...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From CXR to ultrasound: a multi-framework approach to advancing De-implementation in acute care.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Interventions to improve emergency department postintubation sedation and analgesia: a systematic review.

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists·2026
Same author

How Often Are Emergency Patients Diagnosed With Diabetic Ketoacidosis Despite Not Meeting Laboratory Criteria?

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2026
Same author

Continuous Ketone Monitoring in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Prospective Multicenter Method-Comparison and Feasibility Study.

Diabetes technology & therapeutics·2026
Same author

Identifying Adverse Events Associated With High-Risk Opioid Administration Using the Emergency Department Trigger Tool.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2026
Same author

Standard Elements in Studies of Adverse Events and Medical Error: the SESAME statement.

BMJ quality & safety·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

An emergency department patient flow model based on queueing theory principles.

Jennifer L Wiler1, Ehsan Bolandifar, Richard T Griffey

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
|September 21, 2013
PubMed
Summary

A new queuing theory model predicts how emergency department crowding affects patients leaving without being seen (LWBS). Increased arrivals, treatment times, and boarding significantly raise LWBS rates.

More Related Videos

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
06:59

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings

Published on: November 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
06:59

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings

Published on: November 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Operations Research
  • Healthcare Systems Engineering

Background:

  • Patient crowding in emergency departments (EDs) is a significant issue impacting care quality.
  • High rates of patients leaving without being seen (LWBS) are a key indicator of ED overcrowding and system inefficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel queuing theory-based model to predict LWBS rates.
  • To analyze the impact of patient flow dynamics, including arrivals, treatment times, and boarding, on LWBS rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 87,705 adult ED visits from an urban academic center.
  • Adaptation of a call center queuing model to the ED setting, using arrival and boarding data.
  • Model derivation and validation using chi-square and Student's t-tests on distinct data subsets.

Main Results:

  • The model accurately predicted LWBS rates, with a peak period prediction of 4% compared to an observed 3.9%.
  • Increased patient arrivals, treatment times, and boarding durations were directly correlated with higher LWBS rates.
  • A 10% increase in hourly arrivals predicted a rise to 10.8% LWBS; a 30-minute reduction in treatment time predicted a 1.4% decrease.

Conclusions:

  • A validated queuing theory model can predict LWBS rates based on ED crowding factors.
  • Interventions targeting patient arrival, treatment, and boarding times can mitigate LWBS.
  • Further validation across diverse institutional settings is recommended.