Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026
Arthroscopic Excision of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Cysts Using a Double Posteromedial Approach
Published on: October 20, 2023
Unconstrained arthroplasty in type II valgus knees: posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining?
Chia Liang Ang1, Stephanie Fook, Shi Lu Chia
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Level 4, Singapore, 169856, Singapore, med80199@yahoo.com.
Purpose:
Type II valgus knees are defined by medial collateral ligament laxity. This paper studies the results of posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate retaining (CR) knee implants in type II valgus knees.
Methods:
From 1999 to 2009, there were 100 type II valgus knees in 95 patients eligible for study (63 PS, 37 CR). Patients had prospectively collected clinical data up to 2 years after surgery.
Results:
At 24 months after surgery, the CR group had reduced range of motion (PS: median 126.0°, CR: median 114°; n.s.) and a marginally but statistically significant increased valgus alignment (PS: median 5°, CR: median 6°; p = 0.011). Despite this, both groups produced equal and marked improvements in SF-36, function score and knee score of the Knee Society score, and Oxford knee score.
Conclusions:
Overall, both PS and CR implants performed equally well in type II valgus knees at 24 months post-operatively. Further longer-term studies would be warranted to assess for late instability.
Level Of Evidence:
Retrospective, Level III.
