Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introspection without execution: Evidence for introspective switch costs in NoGo trials.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

Conflict adaptation in a confound-minimized face-word Stroop task: exploring the potential settings of an fMRI-related experiment.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

The asymmetric list shift effect - flexible adaptation to new context demands?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Is multitasking efficient? Different metrics, different conclusions.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Harmonizing the stimulation dose of focal transcranial direct current stimulation across target sites.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Task switching promotes switch readiness: Evidence from forced and voluntary task switching.

Cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance.

Rico Fischer1, Caroline Gottschalk1, Gesine Dreisbach2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|September 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive control adapts to reduce interference during dual-tasking. Implicit cues from the environment and explicit cues about location help adjust task shielding for better performance.

More Related Videos

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
09:15

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice

Published on: February 4, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
09:15

The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice

Published on: February 4, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Performing two similar tasks simultaneously requires cognitive control to prevent interference.
  • Adaptive regulation of cognitive control is crucial for shielding primary task processing from secondary task interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how implicit and explicit information influences task shielding adjustments in dual-task performance.
  • To examine the role of context-specific implicit activation and explicit cues in flexible online adjustments of cognitive control.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments 1 and 2 used location-dependent manipulations of between-task interference likelihood to implicitly activate cognitive control.
  • Experiment 3 introduced explicit cues indicating interference level or stimulus location.
  • Dual-task performance was assessed to measure task shielding and interference reduction.

Main Results:

  • Participants showed reduced between-task interference in locations previously associated with high interference demands, demonstrating implicit learning of context.
  • Explicit cues about interference level did not enhance task shielding.
  • Explicit cues about stimulus location led to immediate adjustments in task shielding.

Conclusions:

  • The cognitive system can implicitly register and utilize environmental context to adjust task shielding.
  • Explicit information, particularly location cues, can facilitate rapid, context-sensitive adjustments in cognitive control.
  • Both implicit and explicit information play vital roles in optimizing dual-task performance through adaptive cognitive control.